Of course! Increasing genocide is of little consequence compared with suffering people’s judgment. Glad we share priorities
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: July 17th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Indeed! The actual consequences of (in)actions are unimportant so long as claimed intentions are pure…
- Claim to be anti-genocide,
- Act in a way that increase genocide,
- Accuse others of being pro-genocide,
- Revel in moral superiority
chef’s kiss
Doesn’t vote, gets a lot of genocide instead
3·1 month agoITT: a bunch of non-native English speakers lecturing native English speakers on the meaning and usage of English words in colloquial English :-/
31·1 month agoOk, not a downvoter, but I’ll bite. A system with more than one party is more democratic than a system with a single party. Are you asking which of the two major parties in the US is the “second” party, making the US more democratic than if there were a single party? If so, I see why no one is answering. If not, perhaps you could clarify your question?
Interesting. Genuinely, thanks for your reply— I’m beginning to think there’s been some sort of misunderstanding (likely on my part). I definitely was not defending Pug’s comment…