Abortions after viability have generally been illegal since 1992 (Casey), long before Dobbs.

Your screenshot is out of date.

Sorry, I thought you were being sarcastic.

Then we agree. It’s fine. Most countries don’t consider Palestine to be their problem, so performative bullshit is the most they can muster.

It sounds like your problem is with the OP, which says 146 countries engage in performative bullshit.

I care about accurately summarizing what the OP is about, and it’s about countries that recognize Palestine. It has nothing to do with countries that support or even care the slightest about Palestinians.

Once the battery runs out, they won’t detonate.

That treaty said that the US and Russia would not attack Ukraine. It did not say the US would defend Ukraine against an attack.

The US held up its end.

Recognition just means formally acknowledging that a government exists, it does not imply any sort of cooperation.

For instance, the US recognizes North Korea and Iran but doesn’t cooperate with them, quite the opposite.

Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic are not black or brown, not African, and not Muslim.

Every proposal regarding climate change involves numerous assumptions.

To roll it out to the levels needed would be far more difficult and expensive that converting our entire way of life to renewables

The cost of geoengineering solutions has been estimated to be less than $5b/yr, which includes R&D. In other words, this is something that the government of New York City (annual budget: >$100b) could easily do alone without any international support, even in the face of significant opposition.

In contrast, ending fossil fuel use requires significant international cooperation and is regularly stymied by opposing interests. NYC obviously cannot do it by itself.

So from a pragmatic perspective, geoengineering is definitely the easiest solution. In fact IMO the lack of progress on emission reduction makes it inevitable, at some point some country will weigh the risks of climate change and take matters into its own hands.

deleted by creator

Honest question: has the USA or NATO ever attempted to invade the USSR or Russia?

07 Sep. 2023 18:25

OCTOBER 12, 2023 7:09 PM CET

LOL you really thought nobody was going to check the dates on those articles? Hmm, I wonder if anything happened in Palestine since last October.

Gift link: https://econ.st/3OoMJzz

As I said, he’s unlikely to be impeached. But it’s not impossible, if his deport+tariff plan sparks a Depression scale stock market crash and his popularity plummets. In that case, the oligarchs and populists of the GOP might agree they prefer Vance.

Of course they do. To name just one example, in Bush v Gore the SCOTUS overturned a ruling made by the Florida Supreme Court.

What makes you think this is over?

This is exactly what you’d expect if the judge wants to sentence Trump to jail. He can’t do it now, it would be immediately overturned by the SCOTUS.

So he has no choice but to wait until 2029 (or possibly sooner, in the unlikely event that Trump is impeached again).

Technically, no. “Do no harm” was the motto of a 19th century French physician and later made its way into medical textbooks, but it is not found in the Hippocratic oath.

crimes were carried out by the state

The same is true of others facing ICC charges. For example, Hamas leaders face ICC charges, but that does not justify sanctions against Palestine.

sanctions on Russia citing the ICC arrest

Sanctions against Russia couldn’t cite the ICC charges, because they began long before Putin was charged by the ICC.

the state of Israel is

Like the US and Russia, Israel is not a party to the Rome Statute.