• 0 Posts
  • 117 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


  • Hawk@lemmynsfw.comtomemes@lemmy.worldWarning
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, that’s always a risk, but as you said, humans make mistakes too. And if you change your approach to software development by writing more tests and using strict interfaces or type annotations, etc., it is pretty reliable and definitely saves time.


  • Hawk@lemmynsfw.comtomemes@lemmy.worldWarning
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    They can also be really good for quickly writing code if you line up a whole bunch of tests and line up all the types and then copy and paste that a few times, maybe with a macro in Vim.

    The LLM will fill in the middle correctly, like 90% of the time. Compare it in git, make sure the tests pass, and then that’s an extra 20 minutes I get to spend with my wife and kids.


  • Hawk@lemmynsfw.comtomemes@lemmy.worldWarning
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It would be on the order of aN intensive video game, maybe. Depends on the size of the model, etc.

    Training is definitely expensive but you are right in that it’s a one-time cost.

    Overall, the challenge is that it’s very inefficient. To use a machine learning algorithm to do something that could be implemented deductively is not ideal (On the other hand, if it saves human effort…)

    To a degree, trained models can also be retrained on newer data (eg freezing layers, LoRa, GaLore, Hypernetworks etc). Also newer data can be injected into a prompt to make sure that the responses are aligned with newer versions of software, for example.

    The electricity consumption is a concern, but it’s probably not going to be the end of the world.


  • Hawk@lemmynsfw.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzthe lifestyle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    It’s a lot more like Seaborn. It produces gorgeous plots with a lovely syntax that is quick and easy to use, but it’s not a full drawing toolkit like matplotlib.

    If I need the plot to have a very precise aesthetic, mpl is great. But if I want a high quality statistical plot that looks great. ggplot2 will do it in about 2 seconds. See also plotnine.

    I have no idea how op thinks they could make a decent histogram any quicker than ggplot(data) + geom_histogram(x= x). I mean you don’t even have to leave your shell/editor or extract the SQL into CSV.




  • We mostly use it privately, there are also a handful of software communities too that takes advantage of bridging.

    Personally, I don’t care about Nazis, they come for the same reason I do, privacy and place to speak. I don’t have to let there negative disposition color the software.







  • I suppose the problem that I had with Media Wiki is that every update would break extensions. Particularly mathjax and semantic media Wiki. I too amusing it with Docker which helps a lot.

    So docuicki has a recent pages view which is really good and lists the user that made the edit. That’s what we use for a feed. There’s also an RSS plug-in that will display other feeds which is kind of nice if you want to discuss other articles.

    We create Journal pages that link out to pages for events etc. The events are also linked to from a start page. We display the backlinks using the footer plugin.

    Whilst it’s a bit different from social media in that there is no feed, it’s really nice that it provides, like a database of our family’s life in history.

    We even have pages for cars and repair logs, computers and updates, everything. The struct plugin is amazing And you can always pop it open in SqliteBrowser too!

    I’ve tried a couple of things and I just keep coming back to dokuwiki because it’s the best compromise.






  • No, I don’t. And that’s going to be one of our big differences here. Everyone in my family is tech literate and knows at least a little bit of programming.

    I would strongly suggest dokuwiki. It’s like having a forever Journal of Family affairs and I really like it. I know it’s not quite the social media aesthetic but in my experience I found it to be the thing that stuck.

    I would argue against Mediawiki though. It may be more user-friendly for some family members, but the maintenance becomes a nuisance And pulling things out of the database involves half a dozen joins.

    Even though dokuwiki editing is text in markup, It’s not a hard concept to grasp and the simplicity makes it feel more tangible which may be appreciated by older family members.