• 10 Posts
  • 116 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2025

help-circle







  • I didn’t know ps had streaming only games. Looking it up it seems to be specifically ps3 titles, which makes sense to me considering that the ps3 cell processor is notoriously hard to emulate.

    Online only single player games are able to exist because most people have some sort of a connection all the time and they either don’t know or care that the game is connecting to internet when they play.

    Cloud gaming is a noticeably worse experience and it has much stricter requirements. I think you underestimate the backlash there would be if the next cod just downloaded a streaming client.

    I am concerned that a generation of gamers will sink thousands of dollars into streaming services, end up owning nothing and have a worse experience in the process. I don’t know how to prevent that other than giving people financial stability to make smart decisions.


    1. People using it as a replacement for another person, a search engine or for generating media. These aren’t things you used to use a PC for.
    2. It’s factually not.
    3. Obviously. I’m not saying price increases are a good thing. My point is that higher prices won’t lead to people flocking to LLMs, they’ll keep using what they have even if it’s slow.
    4. Yet for oop’s theory to be viable they need to stay up for longer than the current computers stop being viable.
    5. I don’t question that the AI boom is the cause of price increases. The problem is that even if you alter the theory to be about cloud computing in general the fact that we still have PCs disproved it.
    6. I didn’t see anything about this being about local LLMs. I’m sorry for the people whose primary pc use case was self hosted LLMs but didn’t have the memory to run them…

    Maybe this’ll slow down the adoption of self hosted LLMs, but most people either need a computer for something they can’t use an LLM for or they already use an online LLM for it.



  • This is a stupid take on so many levels.

    1. There isn’t a single PC use case LLMs can replace.
    2. ‘Computation’ done by an LLM is in no way comparable to a computer.
    3. Existing computers don’t become incapacitated because prices rose.
    4. Price increases aren’t permanent.
    5. Cloud computing isn’t new.
    6. Computers don’t need oogles of ram to be capable.

    Getting tired of this trend of people cobbling up hot takes from other people’s opinions.






    • Description of the effects and hardware demands of graphics options.
    • An actual benchmark for ‘optimized settings’ (even if it’s just crunching numbers) instead of hardcoded GPU names.
    • Clear indication of which difficulty the game was balanced for.
    • Msaa. Hate running old games at 200 fps with jagged edges and blur thanks to fxaa.
    • Instant controls switching between controller and keyboard. Tired of games that pick input type at startup, pick input glyphs at startup, ignore first button press from a different input before switching, disable controller if keyboard input is detected etc etc.
    • Not games but steam: just let me force steam input on all games like Proton.

    Also how ‘full potato’ do you want it to be? I assume the settings don’t scale below low, so it’d be just turning off shadows, reflections etc. Would even the lowest resolution textures fit in the vram of an older card? And besides, the engine is probably designed for modern multi core cpus so even if the graphics could be scaled down it might not run well