My bad on the phrasing. I meant individual acts and actors, and spoke too broadly.

You pretend this will do anything to stop cartels. That’s the kool-aid speaking.

Yup. The admin knows that a blue wave is an existential threat to corruption. They have no interest in allowing a free and fair election. Every fight to protect democracy is now critical, from here until Nov 2026.

Every month, they’ve committed further abominations against law and process. 12 more to go.

That’s a lot of words for a post that doesn’t contain a single substantive rebuttal to anything it’s complaining about.

Also, the phrase “entitled to their opinion” has almost never been applied to matters of opinion, and needs to die in a fire yesterday. Apparently that’s an opinion I’m entitled to.

Not lawful. No amount of acknowledging the existence of mechanisms of law determines one’s lawful alignment. A chaotic person isn’t blind to the presence of law, they just don’t feel internally compelled by it.

Strongly disagree with ‘evil’, too, if the act has a meaningful chance of helping somebody innocent.

Next-best strategy: make the set of guests who have to be moved arbitrarily sparse, so that 0% of the hotel’s guests need to be bothered. Oh dear, that’s still infinity of them.