I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.

Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?

Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).

I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.

Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.

Just make sure the label isn’t attached by the overlock seam that holds the garment together, I’ve seen a few things with tags attached like that.

To be fair it’s kinda reassuring, if they had a professional PR team I’d be suspicious it’s a government honeypot.

Of course that could just be what they want us to think.

I imagine they have an embedded raspberry pi type computer in the screen itself.

I wonder what the Graphene owner’s calm and reasonable response to this will be?

what little you can extract will be incredibly expensive

Why do companies want to fund it’s extraction then?

In theory it’s legal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_threat

So? I don’t understand the argument?

We currently need oil and gas, and will for the foreseeable future, we may as well get it ourselves instead of paying foreign despots for it.

Did they delete the community? It doesn’t seem to exist any more.

Iran leading the Butlerian Jihad really wasn’t something I expected.

You can export your followed communities in settings, then import them on another instance after you make an account.

As long as the instance you choose federates with lemmy.world you’ll see exactly the same communities you do now.

Db0 tends to host piracy related communities,.

I suspect onlyoffice will win this one

I’m sceptical tbh, their interpretation of the AGPL seems questionable. The specific wording in the AGPL they’re relying on for their logo preservation term is:

Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it

IMO a logo isn’t attribution, and even if it was there’s no way it could be considered reasonable to require it if they don’t allow you to use it.

Most middle/early-modern English was written in a more “west country” accent.

Now this is interesting.

I assume it isn’t live yet?

Will catodon be hosting it’s own communities, or will it be limited to following lemmy (et al) communities? @panos@catodon.rocks

They seem to have a questionable interpretation of the AGPL https://isitreallyfoss.com/projects/onlyoffice/

Considering the specific clause they cite allows

Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it

A logo isn’t attribution, and even if it was there’s no way it could be considered reasonable to require it if they don’t allow you to use it.

There’s a theory that Machiavelli, being an ardent republican, wrote “the prince” to deliberately give terrible advice.