To be fair that sounds exactly like something an organic redditor would say.

Persecutors have the monopoly on getting people charged with crimes.

I had to look this up and I’m surprised that in most states private prosecution is barred. In the UK it’s still legal, if expensive and uncommon.

I’ll never be able to look at Yoda the same way.

I use unscented deodorant so I can wear (mens) perfume.

All new housing should be built as high above sea level as possible, instead we are building in flood plains.

I was going to disagree with you based on etymological pedantry, but it turns out the Old English “mete” just means “food” so now I have to agree with you based on etymological pedantry.

Even if we take this poll at face value[0], and assume 56% want to rejoin the EU, would the EU want us to rejoin?

Opinions could easily swing 7% the other way after we did, especially if we didn’t get the same conditions as before. Then before you know it someone holds a referendum on leaving and we’re leaving again, it would be a complete mess.

If we should learn anything from the Brexit referendum, it’s that we shouldn’t be making long term decisions based on slim majorities.

[0] The fact that some of the respondents apparently supported rejoining the EU but not the customs union raises questions IMO, since you can’t join the EU without joining the CU as far as I know.

I’ve seen “chicken-free nuggets”, which makes more sense IMO.

It could just be providing hardware I suppose.

There’s no such thing as an “ex”-spy

However three lefts do.

Good

When did the big issue become Maoist? 😆

Not that I’m complaining, it’s certainly an improvement.

It’s hard to fault their logic.

There are plenty of political figures saying we should call China the enemy, very few that openly say we should call the USA an enemy.

That’s not my point though, because you could also say it about other countries (Saudi Arabia, Israel, etc), the fact is dealing with countries that do things we consider shitty is a basic part of geopolitics, unless you want to start a war on twelve fronts.

Unfortunately it’s MIT licence so someone like Google can lock it down like they did with Linux.

Everything they say about China could also be said about the USA.

from their own page

Open Printer will use the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 license for all of its files, including electronics and mechanical design files, firmware code, and the bill of materials.

It states the code and files will be CC-NC licensed, which isn’t open source.

legally

Therein lies the other issue, unless the creator has millions of dollars to fund lawsuits, if a large company or Chinese company decides to clone it he can do nothing. The only people who will respect the license are individuals and small businesses.