That (near decade-old) article really only describes conservative interests affecting the bias of the Wikipedia articles. Many editing incidents have happened since then, and they’re almost entirely attributable to conservatives bias, as well.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_editing_incidents_on_Wikipedia

Of course, it’s the same with all of these other websites, but conservatives are the ones insisting that the entire internet is pitted against them by the powers that be when that couldn’t be further from the truth.

How can the correct take be brain dead? You need to read, a lot.

Maybe you’re just too uninformed?

The commies are here to stay pal

Fascists are not communists. Soviets were fascists. Do the math.

Precisely why internet services should be nationalized.

-not communists

-not communists

-my Lemmy homepage?

Edit: -ah, yes, also not communists.

-Getting Genocided*

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-communist_mass_killings

We pay for those in various other ways.

I kind of like this. I’m always losing the caps to these types of bottles.

Liberalism, being inextricably intertwined with capitalism, is a right-wing ideology. Tankies are often on the wrong side of the issue, but that’s because, like fascists and conservatives, they are reactionaries. Tankies take the side of certain established powers because those powers advertise themselves as resistance to liberal capitalism, without realizing or caring that fascists are manipulating their support. Actual leftists care first and foremost about harm reduction.

I don’t think you understand the pervasiveness of racial animosity.

Yes, greed. Google is an extremely profitable company, wanting more money than they already have is completely unreasonable.