she got over 6,000 followers within 24 hours

If <OneOfWayTooManyPVPGames> can make newbies believe they are outcompeting real players, while they are actually playing against bots, then a social media site could pump their ego with a less than truthful number, I reckon.

I use Arch, and I have an OpenSUSE wallpaper.

Before this, I used Mint and had an Arch wallpaper…

I live to offend.

Artifactually Speaking: An actual archaeologist bringing you exclusive footage and explanations, working theories from the digs he works around Ur. His video correcting some of Miniminuteman’s mistakes is probably what he is most known for. But this one, where he follows an expert’s tour of an ancient house, with explanatory interjections, and a very human story in the middle, might be his best. As well as the continuation of that video, where we follow the careful retrieval of ancient tablets.

Not OP but…

The wiki is a vast resource on every little detail that’s being mapped. I find it a bit difficult to browse sometimes, easier to get to some pages via DDG, but this may just be me. The Beginner’s guide page I imagine might be a decent starting point.

Though I can’t say I myself started there… IMO the easiest way is to just get StreetComplete from F-Droid (or Google Play…), and wing it. That app is extremely user friendly, and literally just asks you a simple question about something in front of you, and as such allows you to fill in or verify some of the details on the map. It’s capable of a lot, but not quite everything, such as adding in new “ways” (roads, structures, anything not a single node).

When you’re not sure about something it’s asking, that’s when “winging it” should be replaced by “wikiing it”. Or looking it up any other way, since there are now decades of confused people asking questions online for your benefit!

Vespucci is the mobile app people tend to use for heavy duty editing, or just to do the stuff SC can’t. This one has a much scarier UI. It takes some getting used to and figuring out, but really isn’t so bad once you know how the app and OSM itself works. You can download it early on, but maybe just to appreciate how easy SC is, at first!

To answer your question about discussions: each “changeset” (SC manages these for you automatically, groups similar quests into the same changeset) can be commented on by any user if they noticed some issue in your edits, or want to ask for clarification. You can go to openstreetmap.org and click “History” up top to see recent changesets that affected the area within your screen. You’ll see that most won’t have a single comment, but if you’re logged in, you can see the option to start a discussion on any of them.

deleted by creator

This channel is mirrored from youtube one to one. Better than being youtube only, but its influences remain the same.

Counterpoint: I am too young to understand this technology, it scares me, and I am unwilling to learn.

I don’t plan on shooting anything weird, but I still don’t want anyone looking at my photos! Luckily it’s pretty trivial to develop at home, for B&W, at least.

> oh shit he dropped the “I don’t have time for this”

> quick, make a last comment so it looks like you won the internet argument!

I think doubling down signaled toxicity, rather than a light tone.

It was just a prank bro

Why? Is it so bad to care about something just because it’s made for kids? Something the editors very likely were at some point?

Or is it literally just the word “fan” in “fandom” that bothers you? Since the show is old and has been around for a long time, the wiki was probably created when the site was called wikia. Is that better?

If it’s so bad that someone made a collection of facts about a series, maybe don’t share their work.

Silly and goofy. Too many FPS.

Why are you saddened? (Other than the fact that it’s a fandom site)

Meanwhile here I am washing before and after, just because I saw it on House.

(Despite the fact that he makes a big deal about it in the first episode and in the numerous times we see him go to the bathroom following that he never once does it again. (Yes. I checked.))

I love that this guy shows up in the most random threads and drops no less than six paragraphs of a detailed answer, explanation and review with personal stories.

You can have Linus Torvalds listed in your private repo as a contributor if you just push a commit with his email address in git config user.email. Probably something similar.

Based on the username, they are trying to DOS github by tagging an unexpected number of users. GL lol.

I never really figured this game out, and the only thing I really remember is that while playing I was listening to a video about the “trying to trademark reaction youtube” debacle.

Anyway. Bye.

When it comes down to it, what really matters is that this comment section has well sourced claims, and can be used as information without further investigation. Here are some sources:

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08039-y

[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07991-x

[3] https://www.forbes.com/sites/mickeymeece/2012/04/12/take-a-look-at-white-slime-a-pink-slime-cousin

[4] https://books.google.com/books?id=VDlaT0KxJfAC&q=Edouard+Michelin+pneumatic-tire+safety

Has it? The Quran didn’t survive this long by mere chance. A group of people deemed it valuable and have ensured its continued existence. Same goes for Twilight. As long as there’s a fanbase, it survives.