Nice straw man

Are you saying money from firms owned by democrats is a sign of corruption? Do you expect the money to come from republican firms? Who else would it come from than firms owned by democrats?

Russia needed Trump to win to survive the invasion they started. China wanted Trump to win to weaken the US for their invasion of Taiwan.

Billionaires were literally buying votes to help Trump because they didn’t want Harris/Democrats to tax them.

Democrats had to spend a lot just to counter all support Trump had that wasn’t on the books.

Admitting how inaccurate a prediction is the scientific approach. Your magic 8-ball approach isn’t.

Again, I’m pointing out that the predictions you’re using are inaccurate and changing candidates this late in the game would cause a clusterfuck so big it would be a guaranteed win for Trump.

Who said anything about my gut? And why are you changing the subject instead of answering my question?

My response was a question that you seem to be avoiding.

What did the data say for Hillary vs Trump? Pretty accurate eh?

What did the data say for Hillary vs Trump? Was it accurate?

Every non-maga I talk to is happy to vote for him. This idea that no one wants Biden is something I’m only hearing on lemmy. And the timing is pretty sus

Everyone I know is happy to vote for him. This idea of changing candidates is only being pushed online right now as far as I can see. Pretty convenient timing too.

He beat Trump once. He’s the incumbent. Changing this late in the game is going to cause a clusterfuck so bad that it would guarantee Trump’s win.

I’m not buying that. Trying to change candidates this late in the game is such a bad idea that the only person that would suggest it is someone who wants Trump to win.

What were the approval ratings for Trump vs Hillary? Pretty accurate eh?

Biden is easily the best chance of winning

Biden is the best chance of winning. Any other choice means Trump wins.

They don’t have one and even if they did Biden is the best chance of winning.

He was the govenor of California at the time. It is an attorney generals job to defend the govenor in court. Whether or not to accept a ruling is the choice of the defendant, not the attorney general.

Attorney generals represent the state and state agencies in federal court. In this example Jerry Brown was the govenor and Harris was representing him in federal court because that is the job of an attorney general.

Again, she didn’t do what you are claiming she did. The accusations are that her coworkers did. I don’t know why you are ignoring this point.

Harris was acting on behalf of Govenor Jerry Brown as defense attorney. So just like OJ Simpson’s lawyers had to defend him because that’s their job regardless of their feelings. Lawyers can’t make decisions for their clients. They just argue on their behalf in court.

The call to relocate the overpopulated prisoners to the firecamps was not made by Harris but other lawyers that worked in the same office. They only suggested it as a temporary solution after the Supreme Court wouldn’t accept their solution to build another prison to address the overpopulation.

The Supreme Court suggested Govenor Jerry Brown release nonviolent prisoners to address the overpopulation. To be clear, this includes sex offenders, white collar criminals and arsonists just to name a few “non-violent” crimes.

Any decisions Harris made in this role were her job as a lawyer defending the previous attorney general’s decisions Govenor Jerry Brown. Most of what you are accusing her of doing was actually done by other lawyers that were from the same office.