Will it be world news, or mostly just US news?

If you don’t know just say you don’t know or don’t engage, don’t call me or others names in the comments. Let’s keep this civil.

don’t tell me what I want

You did that part when you said that trying to change the status quo is inequality…

Yeah, I’m sure I was imagining it. You don’t seem like someone to throw around insults and misogyny

Bigotry and spam doesn’t become ok based on where you say it

You have a 7 hour old account. You’ll have to excuse me if I have no idea who you are

You instance banned me without giving any justification.

The reason will be in the modlog

But generally, it’s spam, transphobia and other bigotry that gets you banned.

that’s literally why I bought up the topic of equality…

What you brought up is an appeal to maintain the current iniquitous status quo, by suggesting that the real problem with men being the aggressors in the vast majority of sexual assaults isn’t the sexual assaults, but that some men might be falsely accused. But hey, if women want to protect themselves from that, we should legalise excluding them and reducing their service options in other areas, because you know, that’s what equality looks like…

The thing is, you don’t give a shit about the real world manifestation of inequality. What you want is a platonic ideal of equality, which doesn’t exist in the real world, and using it as the measure, just ensures that real world inequality stays around and never gets challenged, because people like you can point to the rules and say “We already have equality” .

Different people can be equal in some areas and unequal in others

So what you’re saying is that women being sexually harassed is just how it is in a society with equality?

Because if that’s not what you’re saying, I’m curious why you think a movement to reduce the disparity is a problem? Well, I’m not curious, I know the answer…

Things aren’t equal now. You don’t want that to change.

Why can’t we just support equality for everyone? Why is that so hard?

At least part of it is because of people like you who get upset whenever someone challenges the grossly inequitous status quo.

You could use asklemmy or something similar

They do, but only by passively monitoring RSS feeds for new content that exceeds your current quality. They don’t do active upgrade searches unless you manually trigger them.

The distinction is important if you imported some or all of your media library, rather than building it from scratch with the arr stack stuff. It also matters if you source some your content via providers that don’t have RSS feeds.

!femboy@lemmy.blahaj.zone might be an option?

Graham needs multiple rows of nipples to survive low impact crashes?

Kagi has a fediverse search

Yep. Thus demonstrating the stereotype :)

Believe it or not, you don’t speak for all everyone who isn’t’ cis.

The only person in this conversation trying to speak for all trans people is the person you’re defending

It’s telling that the only fault you see is in the voice of a trans person defending themselves, and not in the voice of the person saying that trans people don’t actually exist, they’re just people confused about stereotypes

Go and re-read the post of the guy you’re defending.

His opening sentence was literally “Being mtf or ftm trans is conforming to gender stereotypes with extra steps”

He is quite openly saying that without gender stereotypes, trans people wouldn’t exist, and that trans people are really just folk who are too caught up in gender stereotypes. He continues to express that opinion even after trans people directly and openly talk about their identity and how it is distinct from stereotypes.

I’ve been having these discussions for a decade or more now. I know red flags, I know dog whistles, and I know why those things are problematic. And to be frank, you don’t.

Hazel has to have brown in the mix somewhere though