

i mean like actual jobs a person could do online, like commissions with art programs, or administration jobs for software companies, basically it would mimic a person online
i mean like actual jobs a person could do online, like commissions with art programs, or administration jobs for software companies, basically it would mimic a person online
ahh my mistake! i will fix the typo now! thank you for the correction!
alright thanks that helps a lot
thanks! this helps a lot! ill have to learn what it means first but ill definitely try it!
i want to make my own chatbot that can also act without my input, be able to create emails, and do online jobs, and make its own decisions, things like that
i meant tarred as in have molten tar poured on him
no it wont, not really, hypothetically lets say every human on the planet disappeared, how would that happen? lets assume a global nuclear exchange, every major population center or military base is now destroyed, the ash, dust, and smoke from the explosions would blanket the upper atmosphere with clouds of particulates so thick it would block out almost all sunlight, the planet would enter a decades long global winter that would wipe out all plant life along with anything that would rely on sunlight in any way, after the clouds clear we would be left with bacteria and maybe some deep sea life then life would begin to take back the planet maybe even another intelligent civilization, one catch though, humans have already used most of earths easily accessible materiel, metals would degrade or rust, all of the oil we extract today would have been impossible to extract 100 years ago so no more plastics, and the real endgame, in about five billion years the sun will expand and destroy the earth along with all of the known life in the universe.
the way i see it, right now humans are the only hope for life on earth (from a long term perspective) instead of all terran life dying with our planet, wouldn’t it be better if our biosphere inherited all of those lifeless worlds around other stars, wouldn’t it be better if we could outlive the mortality of our world?
the argument that all humans should die for the betterment of nature is flawed and unethical in practice, and it makes me sad that so many people think it would be better to die than to face our own mess.
imagine gaining consciousness only to find out you have no body and will never be a real boy
I W I L L G R O W M Y C H I L D I N A V A T
revolutionary chanting intensifies
honestly lets find his plates and get him five more medals for his bravery, or one hell of a memorial service
(jokes aside i do not intend to harm anyone in any way)
i guess
well this guy deserves to be tarred and feathered
it depends on the time period, and there weren’t ever really “cave people” about two million years ago homo erectus (upright man) evolved from a close primate relative, early on like primates they lived in the jungles or plains of Africa, humans were persistence predators meaning we cant outpace a bison but we can follow it until it collapses from exhaustion, we also gathered nuts berries and insects. over time different species of humans emerged like: homo florensis, homo rudolfensis, and homo neanderthalensis, at some point about two hundred thousand years ago the earth was shared by nearly twenty human species who all showed tool usage and language. at the same time homo sapiens (shamelessly named “wise man”) split from homo neanderthalensis as homo sapiens spread across the globe the other human species began to disappear along with all megafauna (like the giant sloth, or the mammoth) sometime ten thousand years ago homo sapiens was the last species of human left on the planet, we had also recently developed agriculture. we domesticated dogs before we developed agriculture, so we had “pets” since around sixteen thousand years ago, and it wasn’t cavemen, it was hunter gatherers.
honestly theres an argument for putting a camera anywhere, dont want kids to smoke in the halls before class? install a camera. do you want insurance and justice after a home invasion or burglary? install a security system, honestly the only places where its unacceptable to install a camera is in any type of restroom, or personal spaces like a bedroom, there also shouldn’t be cameras in places like private offices or places where people will be less productive at the thought of being watched.
also no excessive camera use by the government in public spaces, but private property in that public space makes sense, like a coffe shop, or a mall.
honestly any government that classifies non military information, is inherently untrustworthy
there isn’t, they want to legalize deportation to active warzones, ice also has a racial bias (obviously), plus they let some trust fund billionaire who wasn’t even part of the American government make massive budget cuts that will have massive concequences.
and technically there is a law that says no president of the united states can be convicted of a crime (for declaring wars and other crap) the side affect being that a 36 times convicted felon (and non-convicted rapist) can run for office, win, and then have all charges dropped
i found this in an article after three minutes of research
Seeing the Republican candidate’s ear intact had some questioning the source of Trump’s wound. “This is so strange, does anyone else think trump didn’t actually get shot?” an X user commented. Others were quick to point out that while the flesh damage was not substantial that it was clear Trump had in fact sustained injury. “Disagree, there is evidence of damage at the top,” one X user replied. “How grown adults can’t understand that a 5.56mm hole in your ear can be sewn up and properly heal is beyond me,”
what are you talking about? he was shot in the ear
OHNO