You’re talking about the account that has AI in its name?

What’s with the Sawyer County call out? Do they just have the highest death rate for traffic accidents or something?

Now what would be interesting to hear is that they’re using AI to find the photos.

brian

That Morse code tidbit is actually super interesting. I’m curious how systematically they went with it, like E-I-S-H were the most common, and are ascending in dit counts. And then A being one dit and dash being the next most frequent. Or some combination of “values” for a dit/dash

Right but the way I took the meme was that you would roll until you get a 1, then deciding the next roll is the “real” one.

Ok. I know that this isn’t correct… But isn’t it?

If you’re having an unlimited number of rolls prior to your “real” roll, then you would be, in essence, creating a situation that has a statistically lower chance of happening.

Light moves fast, some shit moving faster than it cause stretchy-spacey-something, determined to be from before the big bang to make it work, and we can see the results I guess

I dunno tho, I’m just making it up and hoping I’m close

🫡

Get cervical cancer? That’s kinda fucked up

Ah, but you’re calculating the area, so it would be length * width, not just multiplying by 2.

So you’re looking at 25 at the bottom and 49 at the top, making your average 37 per layer.

Not sure where you’d land at 12 nuts per layer on average. If you go off 5 nuts “wide” as your diameter you’d end up with at least 20 nuts at the bottom layer (area = π(5/2)² = 19.6).

I don’t know the logistics behind some of these giveaways, but it doesn’t have to mean that the devs are giving up their revenue. It could be gog just fronting the “cost”, no?

The URL is direct to gog tho? Unless you mean you didn’t recognize gog as a reputable website

I have never heard the phrase “runs on the edge”, and the article uses some form of it a half dozen times.

My only results for “edge devices” refer to networking. Is that what they’re trying to say?

I think my sticking point is that it’s not 30 of your coins, necessarily. This is probably where I’m going wrong, but I might only have 100 coins, but there’s a multitude of people that have 1,000 coins, and some still that have 10,000 coins.

I feel like I’m muddling up production/living standards and just plain wealth, but not every individual would need to give 30%. There would be a total amount equaling 30% that is re-allocated.

That is not my interpretation on the paper. It’s not taking 30% and spreading it. It’s we only ever needed to be making 30% of our total being reasonably distributed for everyone to reach those standards.

“Provisioning decent living standards (DLS) for 8.5 billion people would require only 30% of current global resource and energy use, leaving a substantial surplus for additional consumption, public luxury, scientific advancement, and other social investments.”

That is definitely not what is presented in what you quoted.

Out of our current productive capabilities (how much money is “created” if you want), we would only need 30% of it to get 8.5 billion people to a “decent living standard”.

That isnt a 30% reduction, it’s only needing to make 30% of what we already are doing.

How would you go about using a different subdomain without something like a reverse proxy? Heck, in my head that’s almost the only reason I use a reverse proxy

Just because I’m curious, is the fact that this is a “risky gamble” concerning to you? Or that a lawsuit such as this is expected to be drawn out, likely putting a large deterrent on less affluent victims from seeking justice?