A “good journalist” covering Palestine doesn’t have to be close friends with the leaders of a literal terrorist organization and also maybe shouldn’t praise them for mass murdering Jews. Just look at his Telegram channel, there’s plenty more. https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/43342541/20425372
I haven’t said that he deserved to die. I’m just against praising him as a journalist, when he’s clearly praising Hamas for killing Jews.
It’s from his Telegram and there is plenty more of him praising the Hamas. He called them “heroes” on October 7th.
Normal “journalist”.
Sieht doch nice aus, lass dir nichts erzählen.
Middle East Eye is by the way supposedly financed by Qatar and pro Hamas.
Hamas is not a “resistance” group.
Hätte für’s nächste Mal auch 'n Install-Skript im Angebot.
It wasn’t an accusation but simply a fact.
It’s “funny” how that’s the thing you care about and not the actual point of my comment, that those people - communists or not - praise the massacre of October 7th. I feel like their “right” to the place expires by that.
Translate it yourself.
https://kommunistische-organisation.de/stellungnahmen/kufiya-hat-in-buchenwald-hausverbot/
The organization is notorious for being dogmatic, authoritarian communists that in the past praised the Hamas as legitimate “resistance” and interrupted events at the Buchenwald memorial.
https://x.com/leonmwalter/status/1513154520028692493
Oh nice, saying I should kill myself.
Wild assumption. Supporting the state of Israel does not equal supporting a genocide.
Who said the memorial is supporting genocide? Are you nuts?
It’s not about a scarf pattern. The person suing the memorial had repeatedly tried to use the memorial site for their orthodox communist propaganda and already got banned from it for that. To sue the memorial now is just another escalation and intentionally making it look like the bad Germans are banning Palestinians.
The director of the memorial personally said, that people wearing a Kufiyeh are not generally banned, but can be banned because of it. The headline/article is just misleading and sensationalism.
The activist that went to court over this is part of a communist organization that calls October 7th “morally legitimate” and “politically reasonable”.
The court ruled it because some bonkers orthodox communist activists sued the memorial. Those activists repeatedly tried to use the memorial for their pro-Palestine activism and therefore got rejected.
The activist is part of the “Kommunistische/Organisation” which released a reader about alleged myths about the Hamas, that called October 7th “morally legitimate”.
Kinda weird to go to court over that. How about you respect the decision of the memorial in the first place.
Victim blaming?
Is it open source?
Dumb naming.