What I see is a complete lack of sympathy for why women feel this is needing. Instead it’s men feeling attacked and it’s done with a level of hysteria that prevents a rational discussion.

It could be argued that you’re demonstrating the mirror of what you’re describing.

When you come to a discussion with notions of how people are going to respond to you, it can be quite easy to trigger exactly the behaviour that you’re expecting to see. Come expecting rancour, and rancour may well be what you find.

But we’re not able to talk about that because male fragile egos dominate the conversations.

You know I would take a different perspective on this. It’s common for men to believe that expressing emotional vulnerability is a weakness; it’s something that should be stamped out. Think of the Stoic male stereotype. And I think your idea of ‘male fragile egos’ plays into this trope; to me, it’s only a step removed from telling all these men to stop whining because their feelings don’t matter. I personally don’t think you can be a legitimate feminist and reinforce toxic gender stereotypes like this at the same time.

What I see in this thread is men, sometimes indirectly, expressing feelings of vulnerability. To tell these people that what they’re feeling doesn’t matter because women have it worse, and worse tell them that they should have show sympathy, means that everyone sees a degree of hypocrisy.

So why would they be likely to take you arguments seriously?

Do you not see the contradiction between centralised surveillance like this and anarchy? Or are you just a troll?

I’m here to tell you that they don’t even filter the almond nipples out.

You’re drinking at least 5% nipple.

Will nobody think of the poor GPUs?

Either none of the commenters read the article or they’re all the type confused by women choosing the bear.

Nothing but fragile male egos on display.

Take your lazy gendered stereotypes away with you please.

Yeah, I couldn’t find the tweet on his account on nitter at all.

Or mince around.

We’re Training Students To Write Worse To Prove They’re Not Robots, And It’s Pushing Them To Use More AI

If students have to use AI in order to make it look like they’re not using AI — what on earth will a system like this do to people? Quite how it will be able to read the intent of people’s actions without throwing up a huge number of false-positives is something that I don’t understand.

And quite what workers are supposed to do when they receive an ‘alert’ of this nature, I’m not sure. Go up to the individual and tell them that their behaviour has been flagged as suspicious? Way to make me feel more anxious in public.

Getting high off your own supply

Is this an after school special and Trump is finally going to learn the importance of friendship?

“Many were increasingly of the opinion that they’d all made a big mistake in coming down from the trees in the first place. And some said that even the trees had been a bad move, and that no one should ever have left the oceans." - Douglas Adams

Turn back, we all made a horrible mistake.

In fact, in the UK, around half of all sexual abuse cases against children are perpetrated by step parents, yet the depiction of this type of pornography allows porn companies to profit from content that depicts something which is utterly illegal in the UK."

I for one can’t wait until all films and books only contain stories where all characters strictly adhere to the law.

with little to no justification of any kind

I mean Hegseth Rubio said that it was pre-emptive retaliatory action for what the Iranians were surely going to do after the Israelis attacked them. Is that not good enough for you?

I thought he was using claude for that?

no nation-building quagmire

Surely this is how you build the next generation of aggrieved suicide bombers?

Oh, and create an absolutely massive migrant problem.

Starmer keeps doing and saying things that make him seem like he’s a foreign agent.

I think the idea is that legality is supposed to approximate morality here, right?

I would argue it’s more to allow the proles to believe that they live in a world bound by (some) laws; so that it isn’t too obvious that they are subject to the whims of madmen.

Peace through war.

“FREEDOM OF SPEECH”

Thanks babs x