jack [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 28 Posts
  • 309 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2020

help-circle


  • Good piece. What is consistently missing in rhetoric about this is that it’s not just oil. It’s also political in the most straightforward sense. Regardless of the resources the US hungers after, Venezuela is also a socialist project that successfully wearhered a brutal sanctuons regime. If it sticks around, you have a second Cuba in the Caribbean - a much bigger, more populous Cuba. That’s why no simple oil deal would be acceptable to Trump, and more importantly, to Rubio. The US had that in place recently and Venezuela would take it again in a heartbeat. But that reopened oil trade is exactly what boosted Venezuela’s economy out of the hole it was (in addition to the Bolivarian Revolution’s adaptability).

    Now Colombia, America’s long time best South American asset, is Venezuela’s best friend on the continent. The presidents are talking about merging into a leftist coalition state! Even if something like that is a long way off, it can’t be ignored. Nicaragua is stable. Mexico is pursuing social democratic developmentalism effectively. In Brazil, Lula’s weak position has been massively strengthened specifically because he rebuffed the US. There are wins for the US all over the region in Ecuador, Honduras, Bolivia, but none of them feel stable. A win for the US in Peru id likely, but not certain. The only big LatAm player who’s really in the tank for the US is Argentina, and that’s not exactly a thriving economic powerhouse under Milei. And of course, every single one of these countries trades more with China than the US. It’s a disaster.

    The US can tolerate being forced to step down from the global stage for a little specifically because it can use Latin America to regroup and recover. But what if it can’t? What if it can’t bring Venezuela to heel? Would Petro become the @ColombianLenin@hexbear.net? Would MST get to pick Lula’s successor? Would the communists win in Chile? Would Morales roar back into power in Bolivia, elections be damned? Or, worst of all, would Morena decide that the best way to retain their masssive popularity is to go further, get more radical? And all this while the US economy explodes from the obviously stupid AI gamble they can’t avoid!

    Folks, here’s the thing about the domino theory of geopolitics: it’s actually true. Socialist victories in one country propel socialist victories in neighboring countries. There is a virality to popular revolution that has only ever had one vaccine: the good old US of A. If they can’t lock this shit down now, it will be too late - if it isn’t too late already.




  • They are coherent and generally act with class solidarity, that’s like the whole basis of Marxist class analysis, that the ruling class behaves that way.

    Any proper Marxist analysis also understands that the capitalist class is deeply divided and constantly in conflict amongst themselves as individuals, industries, firms, and subclasses. You cannot treat capitalists as one single block.

    What I mean is that the people who didn’t get blackmailed massively outnumber the ones who did and have much more collective power, so if they found this operation intolerable, they would either just cause an “accident” or take legal action against them, probably avoiding exposing the real scope of how it happened but doing a limited hangout type thing.

    Who is they? Who would make the decision? Who would cause the accident and on whose orders? Who would file the legal case? You actually need to specifically lay out how these sorts of capitalist conspiracies would play out because there is not some giant capitalist hivemind that decides what to do in a unified fashion and then simply carries it out. It is completely idealistic and undialectical to not recognize that the capitalists are a messy bunch and their abilities are tightly restrained by their intraclass competition. They must act in the real world with real systems and real people.