Oh boy. Another thing where I am happy to live in germany. No soft-planned things here. If there is a possible appointment (and we pretty much always do appointments to meet each other) we say yes, no, or don’t know yet. Only yes classifies as planned. I know that in most other countries in the world this is not the case. I feel like germany is a very autism friendly country compared to most others when it comes to such ambiguous situations I read about online.

I did because oft W10 / W11 changes

Not only that. How do seven people manage that whole ship, when they needed 1000 people before. Who was in engineering? That bothered me so much during the final scene :-D

The whole season I hoped to see Barclay again. The one character that was missing for me for the series to be complete.

On a steel horse he rides

Might need fixing though. In 3D view there are 2 buildings on top of each other. The stuff that I did, and then the basic structure. So I guess the other thing would need to be deleted?

This is what I am proud of. I didn’t map the original outline of the building, but I did the different building parts including heights for 3D view, entrances, the tunnel through the building and the courtyard.

Could be something for !labrats@discuss.tchncs.de

Thanks. Yeah, i thought about using bollard as description, too. It just also doesn’t really fit the description. Bollards are apparently pillar-shaped obstacles only. Cycle barrier seems to fit best. Per definition also “single” seems to fit best here. I am still a bit bothered by the difference of the picture and scheme from what I would understand as “single cycle barrier”, namely a single barrier. Maybe there could be two or even three options - two sided (path in the middle), one sided (path left or right) and center ( path left and right).

Hm! Description sounds fitting. But why does it say “single” when there are barriers on both sides in the picture and the schematic illustration?