3% false negatives, not false positives.
3% false negatives, not false positives.
Why would you automatically doubt this? You are aware there are other places outside where you live, and different things happen there, right?
Théderboard
Sorry, but isn’t that exactly the batshit stuff they’re accusing? Citizens of those states deserve the same benefits, no matter how dumb they or their leaders are
Blessed be the fruit
I mean I hate him, but I didn’t get that from this. To me it sounded like he was suggesting that her newfound supporters know very little about her, that they are fair-weather followers or something. It’s easy to imagine that one of his yes-men showed him a clip of a rally where somebody was fumbling for her last name, and he just took that idea and magnified a single example of something into “nobody knows”, like he always does.
It’s called tracking when you refer to the vertical spacing. That’s what stands out to me as not so good.
I’m so much more worried about my future kids’ access to toxic alpha male shit and fascist propaganda than I am about porn.
Lol, Edith and Mildred are literally my grandmothers’ names. Edith is a badass and just turned 99.
“This is not a place of honor”
The door was opened normally by the driver, it was just forced open the rest of the way by the motorcycle.
You just said the word tho
EDIT: sorry, not trying to be snarky. You’re right, but your misstep points out the problem
I am truly sorry if I hurt any feelings. I honestly was not aware that we as a society decided that using that word is insensitive. I (34M) was sexually assaulted when I was 8, FWIW, and I understand that words have power. I just didn’t get the memo in this case.
What is the considerate way to title this post?
I’m not OP, and it’s literally in the title. Be an adult.
EDIT: I obviously don’t understand what the issue even is, because you just said rape. Is the word okay for comments but not titles? Or is the problem that you don’t have the reading comprehension skills to read the word in the title and infer the nature of the content behind the link?
If your delicate sensibilities can’t handle reading this, imagine how these prisoners feel. This SHOULD shock you, and maybe that shock will motivate you to action against it.
Most interesting definition, I think, comes from contrapposto. Can it die? No. So long as it retains its “shape” more or less, it functions. If heated or denatured, it no longer functions. More like broken than dead.
Mexican Bowl
I never imagined how this would apply to images. Fascinating! I wonder what other art has a totally different tone to native RTL readers.
I’m not making an argument for the technology or the veracity of the claims, I was literally just pointing out the misunderstanding.