if i am not wrong, it is a fancy nose ring. many indian traditions have some ornament worn across the nose, many times it is then stringed back to ear or hair from the sides. it is for ornamental purposes only afaik

if it is a one of thing, maybe i can help (not a us student, but maybe my school has subscriptions)?

why questionable?

i am not sure, but what i think i read somewhere is “ren” (as in pa"ren"t), so you would go like my ren dropped me to school or something.

but this depends on the version that the instance uses, and not all versions suppport it, only newer ones do, so it is a thing for eventual future

think what they meant is, that if some existing creator has channel on peertube, or someone is unofficially mirroring (for exaample brodie robertson, or this week tonight). The answer afaik is no. The number of creators present is very small, and hence no interest in automation. You can try to find your creator through https://sepiasearch.org/ but that is about it

I am a mod, recieved such messages, and have reverted decisions. Often jsut knowing the person on other side is a human person, with some senses, gives you enough confidence to unban

so tax social media and gaming, not the shop

but phone is not comparable to heroin. gaming or social media could be addicting. if sugar is addicting, do we ban shops? because shops sell sugary stuff (similar to phone providing the addictive thing)

thanks, appreciated

I made a new community today !stupid_questions@lemmings.world. It is a simple community, appreciating absurd questions (not in my community, but the recently asked question 100 men vs gorrila also fits in it). Due to nature of community, it can actually be more interlinked with other communities, for example the gorilla question would be also fit in a biomechanics community ( i do not think we have one yet) but maybe biomechanics community does not have any (or many) subscribers, then stupid_questions folk can also join them. This somewhat happened (to soon to say much about this, all hypothesising) with first post, about brand new sentences, which is now cross posted to linguistics community. I think this can plug in a “humor” “hole” for many communities. General asking communities definitely do appreciatie humor, but may not be “nerdy” enough (i do not like using this word, especially on lemmy, where i could practically categorise everyone using lemmy to be a nerd, if you have a better one please do tell) to willingly subscribe to a “absurdism” community. My guess would be that people who appreciate absurd stuff, might have a stronger correlation with those who are interested in academicc disciplines. Maybe it is a wrong hunch, but my time on internet for however long i have been on it suggests that.

my guess would have been something like 5-10 words (maybe 7). Maybe in literature it would be much higher, as writing capabilities for people writing literature (technical or not) is much better than average stuff an average person says. Averages have to include less than 10 year olds, and even 5 year olds, which might have hard time having 10 words stringed together in a logical manner. Still seems crazy fact to me.

English λ should be around 18 words/sentence

is not that really huge. Does an average sentence really have 18 words? Would love the source.

I never thought the statistics classes I got 20y ago in a Chemistry grad would help me with this, but here we are.

my statistics is coming from QM 1 2 and optics classes

i think you have already given a pretty good and structured method to analyse the situation. Thanks!

lets consider a world where everyone speaks english. Lets also consider some average sentence length (i don’t think sentence lengths would follow a normal distribution, i think they follow a poissonian (or something alike), essentially peaking around mean, and then sentences get rarer as they get longer (but the rate of decrease gets practically constant). I think this is also a better fit for language like english, where with enough amounts of conjuncts and clause phrase substitutions (with verbs and dps here and there) sentences can get to virtually infinte length. English even has a loophole of having ‘;’ which is kinda like full stop, but does not really count as one. (I do not really know how this is classified properly in linguistics, my guess is that it would a conjunction, but then some over powered kind, which allows to break regular grammar rules).

if we pick sentence structure for each verb class (untransitive(not sure if this is what it is called, but the ones which either only require a subject or object), and transitive (normal and di), and then get similar zipfian data for occurence of these, we can cover a lot sentences. Since the sentences do not really have to mean anything (i ate broccoli is just as valid as broccoli ate me) we can then just have list of all dps, and also pick 0, 1, 2 or 3 adjective, and maybe 1 numP (iirc, we were told that we usually do not use more than 3 adjectives), so we can have a complete DP, and then just permutations all DPs with each verb class, then waited by ziph.

if we have m number of adjectives, n number of numP, o number of distinct nouns (lets say just all nouns in a big source like wiki), then (m + 1)^3 * (n + 1) * o (the plus 1 is for null) lets call this some constant D. then for a verb, v with zipf frequency z, all possible ways would be D - v, v - D, D - v - D, D - v - D, D. This is assuming CP don’t exist.

this would give a very big number (adding all the cases), then just divide with number of speakers (available, in a speaking condition every second). I think this should be some kind of estimate.

Please correct me on stuff i got wrong, i am very new to this stuff.

I usually prefer them diced.

i hope you stay wrong. Nothing against you, but you are the absol that has brought the bad news

got into a good college (i did study and all, but odds of me making it were miniscule, and much of it boiled down to a lot of pegs falling down in respective holes, which in hindsight is most definitely a accident).

And 2 days ago, i broke a part of lab equipment - it is not profound, but it is my most accidental accident - costs about 2300 USD

maybe it is because being so weak, it allows things to be come together, and eventually be strong enough, by power of family.

Congrats to you. While this does not technically fall in category of news that we consider, but i will allow this one to slip by. Have a happy life. Also, i do not think this this image preview needs to be marked nsfw. I think a ring is fine. Also i had to delete a comment of yours because you did not marks it as nsfw.

i think it is 100 men and it is not going to be close. purely using humn as fodder, we can have 10-20 men kamikaze style holding/pinning down gorrila, and then ask the rest to take turn and basically throw themselves at gorrila, untill gorilla gets unconscious, and then all have to hit the vitals of gorilla.