The ideal wronger future after all is a simulation where human experience is deleted altogether!

Yeah weird thing to eliminate from a city, or weird thing to see without context. Basically: Wrongers try and envision a better world without deleting the parts of human experience that make it meaningful or worthwhile challenge (impossible)

Is General reasoning in the room with us now?

Hexagons are great, would love to see some hexagon based city plans. Especially if they have designed for walkability and public transport!

It’s more the latter. I can’t really stop anyone from using it, and playing the game of “can you tell if this snippet of code was LLMed” is a fools errand, so I have to choose to ignore that part of it. Testing de-risks bad code, but there is never enough testing… well, there’s only so much I can do within my pay grade.

I’ve since asked this person to stop talking about their copilot usage, so this issue has been resolved, for now.

good to know that they’ve added another body to the memecoin scam centipede.

I absolve you of your perceived need to think about it. You’re cured!

Getting pretty tired of new coworker spruiking copilot all the time, please send me your sympathy and energy so I can weather this trial

This is democracy manifest! (rip)

Hmm, the way I’ve chosen to interpret this is to propose the analogy of a person eating corn as a model of LLMs. You can eat a huge variety of foods and your poop looks more or less the same. Sometimes, you eat something like corn, and the result is you can spot kernels of things resembling real food (i.e. corn kernels) in the poop. However, if you were to inspect said kernels, you would quickly realise they were full of shit.

reported because I want my internet points and I want them NOW (jk)

Worrying about whether or not an LLM has censorship issues is like worrying about the taste of poop.

Oh hey Sam Altman is here, doing his best to bring down deepseek

What? You don’t have a spare $6,000 to run nonsense generators at home?

Really sorry about this but this sounds like the premise to a shitty boomer joke:

“If I wanted to spend another 6000 for a home nonsense generator, I’d get married again!”

etc.

Screenshot of an insta post of a screenshot of a tweet

Tweet:

I can’t believe ChatGPT lost its job to AI

Ok you brought aella up so now I can post this:

Heard this song for the first time the other day and it reminded me of aella.

side note: what’s a good way to post links to music that isn’t youtube?

Working on this take:

Aside from stitching together a bigger and bigger trenchcoat, has open AI done anything else? Just goes to show how vacuous LLMs are if this is what it takes to catch up/outpace them.

This but it’s american vs chinese slop

Isn’t this one of the things that LW was spooked by? Giving the reins to an AI? Won’t someone think of the wrongers???

You’d think the AI safety chuds would have more reservations about using GPT, which they believe has sapience, to learn things. They have the concept of an AI being a good convincer, which, hey, idiots, how have none of you thought the great convincing has started? Also, how have none of you realised that maybe you should be a little harder to convince in general???