The European Union wants elderly people (70+) to undergo medical tests from now on to prove that they are still capable of driving a car every five years. However, the proposal has been met with a lot of criticism.

  • Jomn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This would be great. We should also require all drivers to pass small exams every ~10 years in order to assert that they are up to date with new laws and new types of infrastructure.

    • Flag
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      Or better yet, deal with aquired bad habits and hopefully break people out of them.

    • @smokeythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -191 year ago

      That seems wildly regressive and disproportionately would harm working poor people, who generally would struggle to afford the time and expense involved.

      There’s no evidence that experience degrades driving skill, just aging

      • @nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s no evidence that experience degrades driving skill, just aging

        Have you never seen a taxi or professional on the road before? lol

        As for the working poor, you could easily say that using tax money and law changes that you could force them to get a paid day off once per 10 years for the test, and maybe free lessons and a payout for time spent. I’m sure that the gain in tax money from lower road usage and deaths would pay for this service and replacement transport like public buses.

        • @smokeythebear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -101 year ago

          I’ve seen many driving professionals. The vast vast majority have substantially better driving behavior per km traveled. Again well supported by data.

          Similarly, the regressive nature of increasing barriers to driving is well understood. This can be easily shown by looking at the effects of drivers license prohibitions on undocumented immigrants. Again, there is data.

          Your point about offsetting costs is ignorant to history. A tried and true approach to “starve the beast” is breaking something now and promising to fix it later. The fixes never come, the costs

          It seems like you are someone easily swayed by anecdotes over actual evidence. That’s a really bad way to make policy decisions.

          • @nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Your tone makes me want to not respond to anything, I’ve been through the wringer arguing with people like you so I’m not going to other than one thing.

            You don’t seem to know what starve the beast means. I’m talking about spending tax money to improve the driving department of a country, I’m not talking about intentionally making them under-perform so that people want it privatised…

          • Nobsi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            You claim to have data, but all you are arguing on is anecdotes. Then you talk about people being swayed by anecdotes. Ironic.

      • @Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Experience does not take new laws and infrastructure changes into account, I know plenty of 40-50 year olds who clearly are not up to date on regulations.