We’ve been anticipating it for years, and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the extension will soon no longer be available because it “doesn’t follow the best practices for Chrome extensions”.

Now that it is finally happening, many seem to be oddly resigned to the idea that Google is taking away the best and most powerful ad content blocker available on any web browser today, with one article recommending people set up a DNS based content blocker on their network 😒 – instead of more obvious solutions.

I may not have blogged about this but I recently read an article from 1999 about why Gopher lost out to the Web, where Christopher Lee discusses the importance of the then-novel term “mind share” and how it played an important part in dictating why the web won out. In my last post, I touched on the importance of good information to democracies – the same applies to markets (including the browser market) – and it seems to me that we aren’t getting good information about this topic.

This post is me trying to give you that information, to help increase the mind share of an actual alternative. Enjoy!

      • 2501
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 month ago

        What are some of the game changing extensions?

        • @ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          491 month ago

          For me, it was multi-account containers. All Meta properties open in their own independent, sandboxed tabs now. Xwitter opens in a different independent, sandboxed tab. It makes their tracking cookies useless, plus it also lets you be logged into the same service with multiple accounts simultaneously.

        • @Num10ck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -101 month ago

          probably different for everyone, for me i use Adblocker Ultimate Ublock Origin Enhancer for Youtube DeArrow Stylebot Buster Context play/pause

            • riot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 month ago

              Looking at the source of the comment, OP only hit enter once per extension name they entered, and that’s why they’re showing up as if they’re one long run-on sentence. @Num10ck@lemmy.world probably didn’t know that you have to double enter for things to show up on separate lines.

              I went ahead and found links for all of them, for anyone curious to check em out. I don’t personally know any of them, besides uBlock and Stylebot:

              • @Num10ck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                thanks Riot, it looked fine in Voyager when i was creating it. hitting enter once for carriage return has been correct for a century, whats with the double enter system?

                • riot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  61 month ago

                  As far as I know, that’s just always how it’s been for markdown, which is what Lemmy uses. So in order to be sure that your comment looks the way you want it to, it’s a good idea to use the Preview function, which Voyager thankfully also has under the 3 dots menu in the lower right.

                  @Mr_Blott@feddit.uk also mentioned that you can put two spaces at the end of each word, and then it’ll count the one enter as a proper line break.
                  Like this. You can also do as I did, and just put a dash in front of everything, and then it’ll turn into an unordered list.

          • @Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            Christ on a bike, you’d think they’d give it a more succinct name

            (Either leave a blank line between lines, or put two spaces at the end of each word)

    • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      No, HVEC / H.265 codec support so no modern 4K security camera or plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 month ago

        According to caniuse.com, it works now in the Nightly builds and can be enabled in other builds via the media.wmf.hevc.enabled pref in about:config.

        I use Firefox Dev Edition and I think it’s enabled there. But either way, you can enable it on stable.

        • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 month ago

          Night, windows only, and needs to be enabled with about: config… ie it almost has some support maybe. Also doesn’t work via webrtc so it doesn’t actually help me with the viewing the security cam feeds.

            • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 month ago

              Core web app compatibility vs … “enhanced” ad blocking. MS teams and some other business tools also don’t support Firefox but work fine in Chrome and Safari.

              It is something the Firefox team needs to work on again. I used Firefox from when it was released until Chrome came out and mopped the floor with it. At the time Firefox became the bloated beast and went through a reset.

              Unfortunately trying to have a firm stance on not implementing HVEC when they no longer had the largest market share was a bad move and they seem to be slowly back tracking on that.

              • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                7
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                MS Teams not working as well in Firefox is a “we want you using Edge or Chrome” Microsoft issue, not a Firefox issue.

                You wouldn’t believe the amount of enterprise-sector MS websites that have went from works fine on Firefox to completely broken on anything but Chrome and Edge very quickly after Edge became Chrome with a lick of paint.

                  • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    6
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    So it’s not something Firefox needs to work on, it’s something Microsoft should be punished for. The bulk of these sites for fine if you spoof your useragent to look like edge or chrome, proving it’s nothing to do with browser capability.

                    They’re using their market position to sabotage a competitor.

      • @wax@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 month ago

        Probably no ads on your self-hosted frigate/jellyfin pages though, so you can just keep using chrome for that ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support

        H265 isn’t the only option there. AV1 is great and fully supported by Jellyfin (and I imagine Plex?)

        • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 month ago

          H.265 is the defecto standard on Security cameras, and I am not going to migrate content to AV1 that is already in H.265.

            • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Not when you are using an NVR with scrubbing and everything in the web UI. https://frigate.video/

              All in all it would be an inconvenient workaround for something that already works seamlessly across Safari, Edge, Chrome etc.

              • thermal_shock
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                damn dude, all you do is bitch. maybe get a different camera setup.

                • @shinratdr@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 month ago

                  How is giving a sober and straightforward explanation of why he can’t use Firefox “bitching”? The simple fact is “switch to Firefox” isn’t a solution for everyone in every case. Burying your head in the sand about that benefits nobody.

                  • ddh
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 month ago

                    They can enjoy some ads then, I guess. But it was the general attitude of unwillingness to entertain suggestions and just shutting down every one.

                  • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 month ago

                    It is generally hard to have an opposing opinion or need discussion on the internet without people feeling attacked and start name calling.

          • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            Jellyfin can handle the transcoding to AV1 where needed. Albeit that’s a bit less ideal than direct play as you need the hardware to transcode.

            • @AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Not spending hundreds to upgrade my server to support 4K to 4K transcoding. Even accelerated on a VERY recent CPU or GPU Encoding in AV1 is costly while at the same time decoding H.265.

              Again Essentially every major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

              • @bdonvr@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                If it’s a personal machine in which you have a choice on browser why not just use one of the native Jellyfin apps?

                major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

                Every other major browser is an overcommercialized pile of crap (or built atop the same) that can afford to pay for the licenses to use HEVC or has no qualms shipping proprietary code with their software that they don’t control.

                Also apparently on Windows you can enable experimental HEVC hardware decoding support. You’ll need to install “HEVC Video Extensions” (from Microsoft themselves) ($0.99) in the Windows App Store and toggle “media.wmf.hevc.enabled” in about:config.

      • @vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        Jellyfin

        Use the desktop client or jellyfin-mpv-shim and you’ll get HEVC support and superior image quality.

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        https://caniuse.com/hevc

        looks like the bigger issue is hvec itself. Also the support is extremely spotty with all the other browsers as well, with it still only having limited support in Chrome as well depending on your hardware.

        Or just use av1 instead. I’ve literally never run into this as an issue before lol.