Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 5 days ago

What would you do in this situation?

-5

What would you do in this situation?

Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 5 days ago

Suppose you helped run a place, and there were two people, who we will call Person A and Person B. Person A reported Person B to you for something like harassment or maybe theft of property. Maybe you have a one-chance policy or maybe Person B is a repeat offender, but in any case, you removed Person B from the place you help run. However, for some reason, Person A eventually had a change of heart or expressed guilt over how it played out (or maybe they just miss them) and asked you if Person B could be forgiven some time afterward. Would you unban Person B? And/or would you respond some other way?

Chat

Ludrol
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
2·
5 days ago
Is this in real life or on the internet? Also !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world would be better place to ask.
- Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeOP
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  2·
  4 days ago

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !casualconversation@lemm.ee

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

466 users / day
1.42K users / week
3.24K users / month
7.81K users / 6 months
5 local subscribers
3.01K subscribers
873 Posts
19.1K Comments
Modlog