I was just perusing the modlog when I noticed something interesting. Apparently posting news about Gaza/Palestine is not allowed on !worldnews@sh.itjust.works. I decided to check the side bar and didn’t see anything. The only pinned post also does not indicate that this is not allowed

edit: the mod in question is @Eyekaytee@aussie.zone . sorry for not originally tagging. i hadn’t realized it was a rule that this must be done. i thought it seemed inappropriate since i was trying to initiate a conversation about a community’s rules and culture rather than start drama about an individual

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t call people “tankies,” because I’m not an anti-communist, be they anarchists or not. Not sure what this point is.

    Secondly, no, it’s an awful summation of Marxism-Leninism, and you know that.

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Not sure what this point is.

      There you go again feigning ignorance like you don’t know what I’m talking about

      Secondly, no, it’s an awful summation of Marxism-Leninism, and you know that.

      No it’s not. All you guys do is defend imperialist and authoritarian regimes😆.

      I can’t remember the last time an ml showed concern for the working class

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago
        1. I don’t support imperialism, never have and never will. Imperialism is not “states I don’t like,” it refers to countries that run their economies based on foreign plunder, export of capital, and are controlled by a financial oligarchy in this day and age.

        2. All states are authoritarian, what matters is which class controls that authority. I support socialist states over capitalist states, including use of authority against fascists and capitalists.

        3. MLs constantly show pro-working class concern and advocacy, this is a pure giberish point to again create a strawman.

        • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I don’t support imperialism,

          Russia and Putin are imperialist.

          All states are authoritarian, what matters is which class controls that authority.

          The states you support aren’t governed by the working class but puppets operating under the guise of “vanguardism”.

          MLs constantly show pro-working class concern

          If you DID actually care about the working class, you wouldn’t show support for regimes that actively suppress their well being.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago
            1. Russia doesn’t have the financial capital to be imperialist. It has every reason to want to, Putin’s tried to make amends with the west so that it can join in the plunder like the nationalist he is, but they failed. They lack the hold on the global south the west has.

            2. Socialist states are run by the working class. Vanguards are the organized elements of the most politically advanced of the revolutionary class, states are not distinct from class society but within it and beholden to it.

            3. Socialist states have achieved far more for their people than capitalist states at similar levels of development, you again make up claims that don’t conform to reality. Cuba has a higher life expectancy than the US Empire despite being under intense embargo because of the worker-centric system.

            • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Russia doesn’t have the financial capital to be imperialist. It has every reason to want to,

              Funny how you say this but you MLs go on to admit that an economic system is determined by what is primary in it. Or isn’t this how dialectics works anymore 🤔

              Vanguards are the organized elements of the most politically advanced of the revolutionary class

              So elitism? Because if i remember correctly you have to be actually vetted by the aristocrats in order to join the political party in BOTH Cuba and China.

              Socialist states have achieved far more for their people than capitalist states at similar levels of development

              Another strawman? You’re on a roll today! If you go back and read what i said, i stated that you spend your time defending “regimes that actively suppress their well being”. These regimes being Russia and the DPRK. I never said anything about the actual or imagined benefits of socialism

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Yes, private property is principle in the Russian Federation, it’s capitalist. It isn’t developed enough to be an imperialist country, export of capital is not the underlying factor running their economy, they produce most things they consume and don’t hold a major stock in the global largest companies or holdings.

                Secondly, no, vanguards are not “elitist,” and parties need to be able to expel wreckers and opportunists. There are no aristocrats in Cuba or China.

                Russia is capitalist, and I don’t defend that. As for the DPRK, they do have free healthcare, housing, no taxes, etc and are rebuilding after the US first committed genocide on them and later their largest trading partner collapsed. I support the right of the Korean people to chart their own destiny free of US imperialist aggression. They aren’t a perfect country, no, but at the same time they do generally have expanded safety nets, and the people do support their government.

                • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Yes, private property is principle in the Russian Federation

                  So is invasion of other states in order to assert dominance which is imperialist.

                  vanguards are not “elitist,” and parties need to be able to expel wreckers and opportunists.

                  And who exactly gets to determine who these “wreckers” and “opportunists” are?

                  and the people do support their government.

                  😂😂. Just the same way Turkmenistans support their government. I can’t believe this.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    Russia is not at war with Ukraine “to assert dominance,” it wants the oblasts with seperatists and it wants NATO neutrality. War is not inherently imperialism, nor is annexing land, imperialism involves financial domination and export of capital.

                    As for determining wreckers and opportunists, usually a combination of the party and the public proper.

                    As for the DPRK, yes, the public generally supports the government. The harshest time in the history of the DPRK (outside of when the US was commiting genocide against Koreans on both sides of the parallel) was the Arduous March in the 90s, and yet the Korean people didn’t rebel. The economy is doing much better now, 3 decades on, and increased trade with Russia and China has been immensely helpful for their economy.

                    You don’t have any points on anything.