• cRazi_man@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      As far as Americans are concerned, there are only 2 British accents:

      Villain or wise mentor: Queen’s English

      Henchman or comic relief: Cockney

      I would really like to see a movie about a team up between detectives with Yorkshire, Brummie and Scouse accents; working cross regionally to bring down a gang of criminals. Hardcoded subtitles for the Americans please.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Anecdotal…

      British gal is visiting New York. Loves it and makes plenty of friends. She learns that if she has a job offer she can almost certainly get permission to stay. Goes to an employment agency and gets an interview the same day. Hired to a prestigious firm almost immediately. They tell her they love her classy British accent. In the UK she was lower middle class.

      edit = silly me. I forgot that ‘middle class’ means different things.

      At home, she would be a barmaid at the local.

      In NYC she was a receptionist in a law firm on Madison Avenue.

        • Apocalypteroid@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          My apologies in advance to the good people of Birmingham but it is well documented that the accent is associated with low intelligence.

        • Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Because Americans tend to have positive views of scottish accents. I picked the two most famous examples of accents generally viewed somewhat negatively.

          • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Assuming “British” is being used colloquially, as it often is, to describe someone or something from the UK, then there are Irish accents in the UK. The island of Ireland contains Northern Ireland, which is part of the UK. People from Northern Ireland have Irish accents. Try telling Nadine Coyle she doesn’t have an Irish accent.

              • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                That’s fair. It’s not like the whole thing around Northern Ireland and Britain isn’t without its complications and controversies, to understate it massively. But that applies just as much to saying that people from Northern Ireland aren’t British as much as it does to saying they *are *.

                • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  People from Northern Ireland are legally entitled to choose to be British citizens. That doesn’t make their accent British, any more than them cooking boxty makes boxty British.

            • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Given that the people of Ireland reject that name, it’s a very British thing to deadname them.

              Serious answer - no Prythonic speakers lived in Ireland, so there is no proper basis for the name beyond people quoting a Greek who had never been there. It fell out of use for a millennium and was revised by a Welshman who spoke to angels as a way to erase the separate identities of Scotland, Wales and Ireland. His reasoning was that the King of the Britons, Arthur, had conquered Ireland (if he ever existed, he did not). I am speaking of John Dee who also coined the terms British Empire (it stuck) and British Ocean (it decidedly did not).

              • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                To expand on Arthur, if he ever was a real person his first historical record was written 300 years after his supposed death and it claims he was a war leader, not a king, fighting the Saxons to ultimately no avail, though the Historia Brittonnum makes sure to assure the reader that’s only because the Saxons kept bringing in new troops and not because Arthur lost any battles.

    • NKBTN@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It does, but I once met a Mancunian who sounded, in his own words, common as muck and rough as fuck to a fellow brit, but in the states was treated like Shakespeare