A recent study of Enceladus, one of Saturn’s moons, has detected several organic compounds that had never been recorded there before. The findings, published this month in Nature Astronomy, provide new clues about the interior chemical composition of this icy world, as well as new hope that it could harbor life.

The researchers analyzed data from the Cassini probe, which launched in 1997 and studied Saturn and its moons for years until its destruction in 2017. For Enceladus, Cassini gathered data from ice fragments forcefully ejected from the moon’s subsurface ocean up into space.

Enceladus is one of 274 bodies so far discovered in Saturn’s gravitational pull. It measures about 500 kilometers in diameter, making it the planet’s sixth-largest satellite. While this moon does not stand out for its size, it is notable for its cryovolcanoes—geysers at Enceladus’s south pole that spew out water vapor and ice fragments. Plumes of ejected material can extend to nearly 10,000 kilometers in length, which is more than the distance from Mexico to Patagonia, and some of this material rises into space. The outermost of Saturn’s main rings—its E ring—is primarily made up of ice ejected into space by Enceladus.

This material is believed to come from a saline water chamber beneath the moon’s icy crust that is connected to its rocky core. It’s possible that chemical reactions are taking place down there, under high pressure and heat.

Until now, most chemical analyses of ice from Enceladus were of particles deposited in Saturn’s E ring. But during a high-speed flyby of the moon in 2008, Cassini was fortunate enough to directly sample freshly ejected fragments from a cryovolcano. The new research paper reanalyzed this data, confirming the presence of previously detected organic molecules, as well as revealing compounds that had previously been undetected.

“Such compounds are believed to be intermediates in the synthesis of more complex molecules, which could be potentially biologically relevant. It is important to note, however, that these molecules can be formed abiotically as well,” Nozair Khawaja, a planetary scientist at Freie Universität Berlin and lead author of the study, told Reuters. The discovery significantly expands the range of confirmed organic molecules on Enceladus.

The key is that the compounds appeared in freshly ejected particles, suggesting that they were formed within the moon’s hidden ocean or in contact with its internal interfaces, not during their journey through the E ring or via exposure to the conditions of space. This reinforces the hypothesis that hydrothermal processes beneath Enceladus’s surface could be generating rich organic chemistry. Combining this new research with previous studies, scientists have now found five of the six elements essential for life—carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur—in the satellite’s ejected material.

This itself is not a discovery of life, nor of biosignatures—the signs of life. However, the research confirms that Enceladus has the three basic conditions for life to form: liquid water, an energy source, and essential elements and organics. “Enceladus is, and should be ranked, as the prime target to explore habitability and search whether there is life or not,” Khawaja said.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fascinating. Wasn’t there something similar on Venus, too? I’m certainly no UFO crackpot, but it seems only logical that we’re not alone in the universe. Even if it turns out to be something lesser than bacteria, it points to a similar evolutionary path and the logical conclusion that elsewhere it could be much further along.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Wasn’t there something similar on Venus

      No. Venus has no real moons. Just one captured astroid. And that has no history of suspected life.

      Jupiter Def has some maybe life questions on a moon. But no organic evidence. So that is the most likely you remember. Also Saturn’s moon titan has been considered a likely candidate in the past. But no hints of actual organics.

      This while still a long way from proof. Is the closest we have ever come to potential evidence of life in our Solar system.

      Just in case you are way off. Extra solar has had some organic evidence. K2-18b has been seen by James web to have molecules possibly formed by life. But other option are possible. Just never seen on earth.

      In general now is the time to be following such interests. Lots planned to analyse these sources closer.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No. Venus has no real moons.

        I meant the planet itself. Wikipedia says I remembered right, but recently I guess science is not very optimistic about it.

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          OK I see. Yes some questions were asked. But it was more about a possibility then any evidence of life existing.

          Historically life on Venus has been considered impossible due to very high pressure and heat on the surface. But low (very low)amount of oxygen have been seen by some German scientists in the upper atmosphere. Due to this Some scientists have proposed that some life could exist in the upper atmosphere. As life is needed on earth to produce oxygen.

          But the amount is so low. That it is possible for natural non life processes especially under high pressure to generate oxygen.

          Where as we currently have 0 idea how any form of known life could develop in that environment.

          So yes it’s seen as unlikely. But not impossible.

            • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              The difference is minor but significant.

              Venus shows a potential with a need for answers as to how life would be possible. iE the hint is their but at levels of a compound that is more possible as non life then life. In an environment we have no idea how life could form. We do not even have much in the way of an hypothesis that allows life to have formed.

              where’s as Enceladus is very the opposite. Compounds exist that we have never seen produced another way but life. Theories exist on how it might be possible. But the questions are from the opposite direction. iE Venus we do not understand how life can exist and need more answers. Enceladus we do not know how life can not exist. But have hypothesis with 0 evidence yet on how the effect can happen without life.