silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agoAOC Says Climate Movement Must Become 'Too Big and Too Radical to Ignore'www.commondreams.orgexternal-linkmessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1994arrow-down126
arrow-up1968arrow-down1external-linkAOC Says Climate Movement Must Become 'Too Big and Too Radical to Ignore'www.commondreams.orgsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareGazumi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down2·1 year agoMeanwhile, here in the UK, Ministers consider rollback of green policy to try to win votes from those who really should not vote Tory.
minus-squareDarkThoughts@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoTerm based politics really make me struggle with democracy when it comes to this topic. No one is going to do jack shit if that means they lose votes, or half assed shit at best.
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s why candidates should be randomized
minus-squareDemuniac@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSounds interesting. Isn’t it quite complicated to implement in a society like ours? How do you choose the pool of people?
minus-squareDarkThoughts@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s probably the dumbest suggestions I’ve heard (so far). Bravo.
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s a legitimate democratic system. You should probably inform yourself before having an opinion
minus-squareDarkThoughts@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s a lottery. I’m not going to leave the fate of my country to chance.
minus-squareMartinXYZ@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-21 year agoAren’t you glad, the EU isn’t there to regulate this kind of thing anymore?
minus-squareMr_Blott@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoWE DO NOT USE THE /S We use comprehension
minus-squareIHaveTwoCows@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThere’s still quite a few stragglers here that fail at comprehension, just for the record
minus-squareMr_Blott@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoMORE REASON NOT TO USE THE /S
Meanwhile, here in the UK, Ministers consider rollback of green policy to try to win votes from those who really should not vote Tory.
Term based politics really make me struggle with democracy when it comes to this topic. No one is going to do jack shit if that means they lose votes, or half assed shit at best.
That’s why candidates should be randomized
You would just make it a lottery.
sortition
Sounds interesting. Isn’t it quite complicated to implement in a society like ours? How do you choose the pool of people?
That’s probably the dumbest suggestions I’ve heard (so far). Bravo.
It’s a legitimate democratic system. You should probably inform yourself before having an opinion
That’s a lottery. I’m not going to leave the fate of my country to chance.
Aren’t you glad, the EU isn’t there to regulate this kind of thing anymore?
WE DO NOT USE THE /S
We use comprehension
There’s still quite a few stragglers here that fail at comprehension, just for the record
MORE REASON NOT TO USE THE /S