As millions of Americans are about to go hungry due to the US government refusing to fund SNAP, just remember that only two countries voted against making food a basic human right. The US and the terrorist colony of Israel

              • redrum@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                The CRC grants rights to children [1]; e.g., right to health care, right to education, right to be protected from economic exploitation or hazardous or harmful works… It also expects that states fix a minimun age to work but not forbid children to work.

                Please, stop justify the USA and Israel with false and racist arguments.


                1. human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier. Source: CRC ↩︎

      • Saryn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        That’s not a real argument, just typical whatabout-ism.

        countries that host the child factories

        Ah yes, the dreaded child factories. The ones in Sweden are particularly bad. Bought a defective child a few months back. Kept asking for food.

              • Saryn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Notice that you didn’t deny engaging in whataboutism.

                I suggest we change the name of the fallacy from tu quoque to y tu mama tambien.

                  • Saryn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 days ago

                    The irony of course being that you think whataboutism is when you simply change the topic to an unrelated one (that’s what you’re implying). When in fact it refers to the act of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation on the same subject instead of offering an explanation. Which is exactly what you did.

                    So as it turns out, you’re the one who actually doesn’t know what whataboutism means, and basically self-reported your ignorance. I wasn’t expecting this plot twist - it’s laughable given how simple of a concept it is.

                    But hey, keep digging that hole. Let’s see how deep you can go.