no banana@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoI promise I'm notmedia.piefed.worldexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1383arrow-down113
arrow-up1370arrow-down1external-linkI promise I'm notmedia.piefed.worldno banana@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squarewieson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 days agotldr but unrealised gains is still wealth. It’s up to the tax law to define that.
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agothe reason they don’t consider unrealized gains is that they don’t want to pay refunds to people who buy losses.
tldr but unrealised gains is still wealth. It’s up to the tax law to define that.
the reason they don’t consider unrealized gains is that they don’t want to pay refunds to people who buy losses.