Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-26 days agoThe Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up1398arrow-down115file-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldlatestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
arrow-up1383arrow-down1external-linkThe Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"lemmy.mlArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-26 days agomessage-square111fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldlatestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/38830374 tweet economist article archive.is paywall bypass https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology excerpts of economist article: […]
minus-squareMaeve@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·8 days agoHow many times has Big 5 been debunked yet employers still like it for reasons?
![The Economist on using phrenology for hiring and lending decisions: "Some might argue that face-based analysis is more meritocratic" […] "For people without access to credit, that could be a blessing"](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/14f5a0b4-82b6-498d-a689-36c2824dd296.png){kind=link}
How many times has Big 5 been debunked yet employers still like it for reasons?