I saw that people are buying $150 or $250 sockbags for their iphone. They also are buying $30 glass cups from Starbucks. Can people accept that the customer is a major part of the problem?

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes. Everyone is a consumer. Most people are producers. When we talk about “consumers”, we are just talking about people in their capacity as someone who buys things. It doesnt mean that is their whole identity. It’s just a useful shorthand. And yes, we can talk about producers and consumers as far back as trade goes, which goes all the way back to pre-history.

      • RockBottom@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Capitalism’s rebranding as “consumerism” is reducing people to that one thing they do in order to not starve to death. Capital is a collectivist term (so disliked by the hegemon), while consumer is by nature very individualistic, like CO2 footprint and similar propaganda language.

        • blarghly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Are… are you high? “Consumerism” and “capitalism” are completely different terms, used in completely different contexts. And I have never once heard someone use “consumerism” in a positive light. This is conspiracy bullshit