• morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    The opposite also applies. If there’s no actual power or reward or suffering, what’s the point of being bad?

  • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    Back in like 2008 I was playing the single player campaign for the first COD: Modern Warfare and I almost failed the first mission because I didn’t want to kill noncombatants on a boat.

    Meanwhile in 2025 that’s what our military is doing these days in Venezuelan waters.

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    If you can’t let your dark-side out to play in a safe environment, you risk not knowing it well enough to keep it coming out in ways you didn’t plan for.

    Reference : The majority of murder and violent crime.

  • arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s scary how much of the population views moral problems by “what’s in it for me and what are the consequences”

    Very little altruism

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ve had religious people ask me (am atheist) “without God what is stopping you from being evil?” and holy shit, I can’t believe people think like that

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        A good answer is “I rape and murder exactly as much as I want to, which is none. If eternal hellfire is the only think keeping you from doing those things then I hope you never lose your faith.”

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        This is a real problem we’re facing.

        It’s part of the overarching authoritarian worldview, that fear of consequences from someone above you on the food chain is the primary motivation for anyone to be “good”.

        The problem comes from it being extremely time consuming to explain how “being good” benefits you personally, even if all possibility of consequences are removed. Essentially you have to explain the entire concept of the word “honor” to them. What are the benefits of being honorable, and how do these benefits (for you personally) outweigh the benefits of being dishonorable?

        But if someone wasn’t raised that way, then it really does need to be explained to them. Otherwise it’s unrealistic to expect them to just somehow figure it out for themselves.

        edit for grammar

        edit2: To elaborate a little bit, the benefit of honor boils down to efficiency and the advantages of cooperation. People can perceive patterns, and when someone is dishonorable, even if people won’t come attack them somehow, they’ll still be reluctant to ever cooperate with that person. An honorable person thus has far more resources from their community that they can draw on in the pursuit of their own personal goals. In addition, it simplifies their lives. Instead of having to, say, track the lies you’ve told so you don’t mess up and create inconsistencies, if you live honorably you free up all that energy to devote to your goals in other ways.

        Note, my summary argument is not overly compelling just on its own. I had to boil it down too much to make it a reasonable length. You need many examples, or preferably actual life experience on how it works, for the argument to actually become somewhat convincing.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            Personal preference is fine too. For many people, though, they will require a personal benefit. They won’t just enjoy it. Especially if they see other people who aren’t good and are doing better than them.

        • Best_Jeanist@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          Everyone needs to watch the 90s movie Clifford, it explains this awesomely. Clifford is an annoying and manipulative brat who only cares about one thing. He gets it, and then he decides that he’d rather be well behaved, because he wants people to like him.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Modern conservatism necessitates that society is a zero sum game. And we are seeing exactly how that plays out in the US.

  • binarytobis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    There’s a surprise quick time event in Assassin’s Creed 2 where Leonardo Da Vinci goes in for a hug, and if you don’t press X reasonably quickly he pulls back looking a little bummed out.

    I ripped my power cord out of the wall to make sure it didn’t save,

  • Isa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    Plus: to be(come) an asshole is, respectively would be a very huge consequence in my book.