- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
Scientists used tiny new sensors to follow the insects on journeys that take thousands of miles to their winter colonies in Mexico.
Scientists used tiny new sensors to follow the insects on journeys that take thousands of miles to their winter colonies in Mexico.
Cool, but…
What a completely useless comparison.
By my math, it’s equivalent to a typical human carrying an 18-22 lb backpack. Why wouldn’t they just say that?
My half raisins are just overburdened by all these grains of rice
Why would you use something useless like lb that means nothing in 99% of the civilized world?
By my math you’re referring to a backpack weighing about 8-10kg in SI units.
Why would you use something useless like kg that means nothing in 99.999…% of the natural universe?
By my math you’re referring to a backpack weighing about (3.7–4.6) × 10⁸ Planck masses.
As a strong proponent of the metric system, I humbly conceed your point.
It’s 95%. If you’re going to be annoying at least do it right.
Oh my bad. You’re probably still considering the US part of the civilized world? I was only talking about Liberia and Myanmar actually.
deleted by creator
Yeah. The minute I read the title I thought, Please don’t tell me they’re sticking cameras on these poor creatures. It disturbs me that no scientists seem to care about strapping cameras to wild creatures and what effect that has on their already difficult lives.
Even if they convince themselves that what they’re doing is somehow necessary they could at the very least admit the harm they are doing to the animal.