President Donald Trump on Thursday assailed Democratic lawmakers who told members of U.S. military they must refuse any illegal orders, calling them traitors who should face execution.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251120174004/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-democrats-who-told-us-military-refuse-illegal-orders-deserve-death-2025-11-20/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’d like for you to point that part out, as the only other reference is here:

    From the commentary/guidance for Article 92:

    “An order is presumed lawful. … A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders …”

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Again, order can be ruled illegal later, but until the military court makes that determination, you will be held in breach of UCMJ for refusing to obey an order.
      If you have some time listen to https://youtu.be/TwPLqGkYnBA where an actual JAG explains it better than I can.

      • Talaraine@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        So the Nuremburg trials still hold fast as an example here. A soldier can make the determination to undergo potential courtmartial, or he can avoid the death squad. I know which one I’d pick. We don’t have mindless soldiers in our military.

        If an order violates the law, they are wise to disobey, just as I said.

        No matter who you are or what the situation is, the ‘right thing’ just might come with a price, and a good person is simply willing to pay it.