• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Oh, well if you meant ENCLOSED, you maybe should have said that originally.

    Uhh… the original conversation topic was about that… I shouldn’t have to specify… if it needs to be specified, that means you missed the topic originally, so your aren’t being pedantic… you’re just a moron or you thought you could be smart by being pedantic, while Ignoring the entire topic title….

    Being pedantic only works if you are A correct, and B don’t miss the obvious.

    You did neither.

    Just because you assume something can close without a door doesn’t make it inside. Using your example, parking a trailer with it sticking out, would make it not inside the garage anymore, because inside implies COMPLETELY. So without lips, it’s not a mouth, and can’t be inside. If you understood this, my comment wouldn’t need to specify this… since this is obvious once you understand the nuance of something being actually inside. Like the CD and VHS’ from the topic……………… and I added floppies because they’re identical, I called out SDs…. Since they are different from those 3…… why? The door making them actually inside! Do you need this explained still……?

    You can’t be a pedant of you don’t actually understand the topic, you’re attempting to be smart, while being an idiot. The picture even specifies eating like a mouth! Does that not include enclosing inside with a door (lips).