Without playing/seeing what Horses is like, it’s difficult to evaluate Valve’s decision.
That being said there is tons of weird and fucked up NSFW stuff on Steam.
Banning a transgressive game seemingly without any explicit content seems excessive.
From my perspective, this is another reason it’s a bad idea to have an American company (even a somewhat user-focused one like Valve) be a steward of modern digital services. Local culture puts too much emphasis on the theatrical elements of morality. Not to mention the challenges faced by the locals in areas such as corruption and rule of law (Valve trying to cheat on refunds, adding mandatory arbitration clauses, Soviet-style kangaroo courts essentially, and operating unlicensed gambling schemes).
It was rejected because in the build they submitted for review a minor was riding a naked person with a horse mask and valve saw that as sexual which i find fair considering ponyplay being a thing. I understand valve wanting to distance themselves from anything involving a minor that could be seen as sexual
CONTENT WARNING: This game contains scenes of physical violence, psychological abuse, gory imagery (mutilation, blood), depictions of slavery, physical and psychological torture, domestic abuse, sexual assault, suicide, and misogyny.
The game looks like it’s about keeping people on a ranch, with horse masks on.
I guess the banhammer was swung because of sexual violence and mutilation of subjugated slaves?
From my perspective, this is another reason it’s a bad idea to have an American company (even a somewhat user-focused one like Valve) be a steward of modern digital services. Local culture puts too much emphasis on the theatrical elements of morality.
You’re welcome to perceive what I am saying as a reflexive “America bad” outburst driven by current developments.
And I will take the liberty of saying that it is possible that there is significant nuance to my arguement.
Not to mention that I’ve lived for several years across multiple countries in North America, Europe and Asia and visited another 25 countries.
Btw, I am not only flexing with the “I have travelled the world!!!” comments. :)
I am also pointing out that it would be difficult for me to enjoy living/travelling in other countries if I reflexively said things like “This place sucks! What a shithole!”.
Without playing/seeing what Horses is like, it’s difficult to evaluate Valve’s decision.
That being said there is tons of weird and fucked up NSFW stuff on Steam.
Banning a transgressive game seemingly without any explicit content seems excessive.
From my perspective, this is another reason it’s a bad idea to have an American company (even a somewhat user-focused one like Valve) be a steward of modern digital services. Local culture puts too much emphasis on the theatrical elements of morality. Not to mention the challenges faced by the locals in areas such as corruption and rule of law (Valve trying to cheat on refunds, adding mandatory arbitration clauses, Soviet-style kangaroo courts essentially, and operating unlicensed gambling schemes).
It was rejected because in the build they submitted for review a minor was riding a naked person with a horse mask and valve saw that as sexual which i find fair considering ponyplay being a thing. I understand valve wanting to distance themselves from anything involving a minor that could be seen as sexual
deleted by creator
If that’s the case I can’t really fault Valve here.
They do have a website up - https://www.horses.wtf/
by their own description:
The game looks like it’s about keeping people on a ranch, with horse masks on.
I guess the banhammer was swung because of sexual violence and mutilation of subjugated slaves?
From another article posted about this earlier, the version of the game sent to Valve for review had a minor as the main protagonist.
There was a quite a bit of discussion about that on another post: https://lemmy.world/post/39297021
Based on the trailer seems like a game version of a gore/torture/faux-snuff horror movie.
Yeah, I hear you. It should be based in a sane country like Australia or the United Kingdom or China or Japan.
Point is, making this an ‘America bad’ problem is just ignoring that it could be so much worse if it was based elsewhere.
The issue is the power, not who wields it.
You’re welcome to perceive what I am saying as a reflexive “America bad” outburst driven by current developments.
And I will take the liberty of saying that it is possible that there is significant nuance to my arguement.
Not to mention that I’ve lived for several years across multiple countries in North America, Europe and Asia and visited another 25 countries.
Btw, I am not only flexing with the “I have travelled the world!!!” comments. :)
I am also pointing out that it would be difficult for me to enjoy living/travelling in other countries if I reflexively said things like “This place sucks! What a shithole!”.