• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Z is elevation. Any real world application, z goes up down. 3D applications SHOULD use it for elevation. I despise that many do not. It’s so fucking confusing. 2D, sure y go brrr. But once that 3rd dimension is added, y needs to take several seats and quit trying to take on dimensions it doesn’t have any right to.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It makes more sense if you’ve ever drawn in CAD. Top view, x and y. Now side view, y and z or y and x. You look down on x and y, and if you are extruding you now create the z axis dimensions. For the people who draft on the side axis: you are true psychos (ok, unless you’re using a lathe I suppose, or if the silhouette is more defined from the side… ok maybe not psycho, just odd)

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        I do use CAD software but always have my items resting on an x/y plane with z being height. I do some 3d printing and basic cad designs, so z being elevation still makes sense there.

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        User look sideways at item on shelf. Designers look down on paper. Both viewpoints are needed for it to be a good object.

        Architects do both because they have all that math and something serious to prove.