• TeddE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yes, but there’s so much more to compositing a good shot than just focal length. I’m recommending to a new hobbyist to walk before they run. Framing, lighting, perspective - a cheap phone from 2019 off eBay is still better than what your grandparents had, and is better than cameras from 99% of human history.

      • TeddE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well, went and did research (gasp!) and found I had been lied to! Or at least to say it’s complicated. My statement does have merit in that yes! The most popular cameras from 2019 average 25 megapixels, and that puts it neck and neck to several uses of film (frequently animated uses).

        I still think my primary argument is unchanged, but the precise details of my statement are somewhat hyperbolic. In my defence, “better than film” has been the marketing for at least a decade and there are things that digital photography shine at.

        Still, thank you for keeping me in check.

        https://www.learnfilm.photography/the-resolution-of-film-negatives/

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      a cheap phone today is better than a digital camera from 15-20 years ago. but neither can stand up to analogue cameras that use film. we can extract 4k video from footage shot on film in the 80’s (any film footage really, but i mention 80’s because the music video for Last Christmas available on youtube in 4k is a wonderful example)