How do y’all cope with this

  • justastranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure is a moronic idea that’ll create an environmental disaster worse than the infrastructure existing. Instead, sabotage it so that it stops flowing.

    • Grayox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right?! All the dumbfucks talking about blowing up pipelines want to trade one environmental disaster for another. Its pathetically misguided.

    • meathorse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good point, way less environmental damage to do something about the execs and billionaires in this world

    • Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey got any fun terror plans I can hop in on? Just text me the address and I’m there.

      -Your friendly neighborhood FBI informant.

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh wait, we already did that last year

      -Your friendly neighborhood CIA agent

    • Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ethics refer to a set of rules provided by an external source. I think this is 100% a moral obligation to blow shit up.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would say ethics doesn’t really make sense unless there is some sort of rulebook calling for this that I’m not aware of. Because I’d say moral-but-not-ethical is doing what’s right even if it’s against the rules/expectations that apply to you (particularly in a professional capacity, and even then there are different contexts like company policy vs wider ethics).

  • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are two wolves inside me

    One wants to discuss the moral obligation to commit acts of sabotage against fossil fuels infrastructure that is killing the planet

    The other wants to have good opsec and not possibly incriminate myself for future actions I may or may not be involved in by posting

    Disclaimer for any feds reading this: I am a clown and everything I do/say/post is hypothetical and/or for comedy only janet-wink

  • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you blew up fossil fuel infrastructure, you’d go to jail. The US blew up Nord Stream, nothing happened. We truly live in a society joker-dancing

  • Neon_Dystopia [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As the situation worsens it’s only a matter of time before rampant eco-terrorism, if we’re not all too busy dying in water wars of course.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I assume there’s gotta be a better way. Like clogging it beyond repair (shut off+completely solidified), siphoning operations (assuming a spill isn’t caused)… And in either case, converting it into something less bad and/or storing the carbon in a stable manner.

      (Although even rebuilding from what I see may be at least $1M-$2M per mile, they sure have the money but it’s not insignificant either)

    • Lemmygradwontallowme [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Come on, if the Russians/Americans/Ukrainians can blow up the 1st Nordstrom pipeline, and scare both Germany and Russia from starting the other pipeline, why not? /s

      Jokes aside though, who knows what will happen if someone holds up some oil dock workers at gunpoint and orders them to stop the flow of oil and scatter.

      One can essentially sanction the world en masse, with just a dozen people

      Plus, if that gunman or gunmen can hold the infrastructure as a shield from the resulting police and military, it can used as a negotiation tool with them temporarily, or if things go to shit, they will otherwise just show the ruthlessness and brutality of the state apparatus in using drone strikes etc…

  • Chunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I heard they protect the pipelines near places where it’s easy to access and they know pretty quickly where the break happened so they can find you. It’s quite difficult to actually figure out how to blow up a pipeline and not immediately get arrested.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are thousands of miles of pipeline, Im not so sure.

      For all their bluster, did the FBI ever find the guy(s) who shot up the substation in south carolina last year? No it isn’t a pipeline, and it was attacked for dumbass rightoid reasons, but… did they ever find who did it?

      • Chunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but they’re in the boonies. So if you go out there in a Jeep with your buddies and blow a pipeline they know where to look. It’s not that it’s 100% secure it’s that it’s secure against a lot of smaller acts of violence.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve looped around to sadomasochism.

    Destroy the world! Kill us all! Burn me more daddy!!! 👐 😩 💦

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same thoughts, my mind even came up with a good plan. Drones equipped with remote activated termite pots. It melts through steel easily and fossil fuels burn. You can do this from a distance and it uses cheap available materials. I don’t have the guts to do it though… So it remains an Idea.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the us and China had a nuclear war the planet might survive.

    • trailing9@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We will. Cancer is only a problem if you don’t have Moderna’s cancer treatment.

      The bigger problem is managing supply chains when China is gone.

  • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who gives a fuck if you end up on a list? The only list you should be worried about is Santa’s good list and that’s not for another two months

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The terrorists in that book are ethical and fair. In reality the types that would actually engage in that behavior would consider collateral damage as part of the “de growth”.

      • keefshape@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The terrorists in the book are ethical and fair, because B is Mother. Without his black-ops hand guiding those kinds of things, they allude it would be a lot worse than drone swarms and pebble missiles. Transforming blind rageful terrorism into relatively guided eco-sabotage and brinksmanship that pushes through carboncoins and wealth caps.

        I also noted this time around, that Franks talk with the Kali takes place before Mary and B chat about blackbooks stuff. So B was already doing the needful, for a long while.