Also, fun fact: drag queen isnt an ideology. Children simply are more engaged with wild and colorful aesthetics than they would be with you buncha fucking droll-ass, bible-thumping prudes
Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other.
NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop.
READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.
I don’t know what else to tell you. Multiple people have pointed out flaws in your logic and your response each time is " lol you’re wrong I’m right" and that kinda is exactly what you accused me of. But whatever, it doesn’t matter. You’re just some random on the internet trying to get into arguments, or maybe you actually believe the shit you’re shoveling, either way it doesn’t matter.
Okay, let me clarify for your psychotically delusional amd logic-deficient excuse for a ‘mind’:
1- Serial killing isnt an ideology.
2- Drag shows arent an ideology.
3- Nobody is openly identifying as a serial killer out of pride.
4-Men dressing non-traditionally is not threatening behavior in any way to anyone.
5- Serial killers and drag queens are not philosophical equals.
6-Comparing them to each other in relation to a literary exercise is what closet pedophiles do.
People wear make up for different reasons and have different approaches to wearing it. For all I know you think anyone wearing red lipstick makes them a whore. I don’t draw conclusions about what people do with their genitals based on that they put on their faces. I was just trying to figure out how you were coming to your conclusions.
It sounds like you have a psychotically antisocial mental disorder. You are convoluting the discussion unnecessarily and entirely without rational thought.
Removed by mod
Also, fun fact: drag queen isnt an ideology. Children simply are more engaged with wild and colorful aesthetics than they would be with you buncha fucking droll-ass, bible-thumping prudes
Removed by mod
No I dont. If it doesnt matter, what does it matter so much TO YOU?
And who the fuck are you to be telling everyone else how to live their fucking lives?
Removed by mod
Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other. NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop. READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
Removed by mod
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.
Removed by mod
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.
Imma need to to read your post again slowly and then explain clearly how you think that is a valid and logical point.
Removed by mod
My dude, you just described yourself.
Removed by mod
I don’t know what else to tell you. Multiple people have pointed out flaws in your logic and your response each time is " lol you’re wrong I’m right" and that kinda is exactly what you accused me of. But whatever, it doesn’t matter. You’re just some random on the internet trying to get into arguments, or maybe you actually believe the shit you’re shoveling, either way it doesn’t matter.
Removed by mod
The echidna has a prehensile penis with four heads that is one fifth the length of it’s body.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
No it isn’t. It isn’t straightforward at all. That’s exactly why I asked.
Removed by mod
Okay, let me clarify for your psychotically delusional amd logic-deficient excuse for a ‘mind’: 1- Serial killing isnt an ideology. 2- Drag shows arent an ideology. 3- Nobody is openly identifying as a serial killer out of pride. 4-Men dressing non-traditionally is not threatening behavior in any way to anyone. 5- Serial killers and drag queens are not philosophical equals. 6-Comparing them to each other in relation to a literary exercise is what closet pedophiles do.
What’s prostitute makeup?
Removed by mod
I mean, sure I could Google it. I was asking you because I was wondering what you meant by it.
Removed by mod
People wear make up for different reasons and have different approaches to wearing it. For all I know you think anyone wearing red lipstick makes them a whore. I don’t draw conclusions about what people do with their genitals based on that they put on their faces. I was just trying to figure out how you were coming to your conclusions.
Removed by mod
If it’s so simple, why are you struggling to answer?
Removed by mod
It sounds like you have a psychotically antisocial mental disorder. You are convoluting the discussion unnecessarily and entirely without rational thought.
Also you will never get laid.
Removed by mod