X adds video calling — and lets strangers ring you: Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up::Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up

          • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well it’s hard to tell sarcasm online, especially when no steps to convey tone or articulation have been added to the text formatting.

              • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                Or, you know, instead of pulling a straw man simply italicize part of the comment to emphasize sarcasm…

                • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I get that you have a hard time recognizing jokes and non-literal language, and I really do sympathize, but it’s unreasonable to expect everyone to change the way they write. Realistically, it’s just not going to happen. Your options are to accept that you will frequently misunderstand people or try to level up your reading comprehension.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      An explanation I’ve heard for why we don’t have “everything apps” in the US is because we all have an app store on our phones and that’s the niche the everything apps were really solving for.

      • golli@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That and i think we also adopted technology differently. Places like China or india in a way skipped most of the PC/Laptop phase and went straight to smartphones as their main device to access everything. On a PC/Laptop you’ll access most things through a browser, so many services already existed this way and also remain accessible through that.

        And even to this day many will prefer to do some things on a larger screen rather than a smartphone, even if by now it is the primary device.

        • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Comes pre-installed on the phone. I think it was possible to download apps from websites too, it was just not as convenient.

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So is there like a single app on their Home Screen?

            They tap it and it opens an app with a bunch of other apps in it? Or a bunch of tabs, or other widgets you have to scroll around to find the functionality you want?

            I get why China would want this, for content control. But I don’t see why india or anywhere else would want this.

            • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There are still like calculator apps and web browsers and such, “everything” is more like instead of Paypal/Venmo, you use WeChat. Instead of ApplePay, WeChat. Instead of Facebook, WeChat. Instead of Uber, WeChat. It’s just all that functionality smashed into one app.

              I don’t think it’s designed by the state to be centralized, it’s just how things happened in a lot of Asia.

  • hogunner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to go ahead and assume the one person on X that you can’t call is old Muck himself. Wonder why?

    Then again, X is such a shit show and Elon is so incapable of thinking two steps ahead of his feet that maybe you can call him lol

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      He might not consider it a necessary feature. I mean, not even his own kids want to talk to him.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The system means that all accounts are liable to receive calls from accounts you follow, or those run by people whose number you have in your address book. To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.

      He’s probably left it on.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My bet is he’d be too fucking arrogant and think people would genuinely call him out of admiration and he could create some viral moment showcasing how awesome he is.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My bet is this isn’t really about people calling each other, but more about exTwitter having access to users’ microphones and cameras and is turned on by default.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair anyone can already call me with my phone number. Although it’s pretty anoying too.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I remember years ago a high school friend of mine freaked out because her phone number and current address showed up in one of those free people search sites. I asked her “Are you listed in the phone book?” and she said “oh… yeah… I am”.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a bit different. This is the equivalent of letting me call you right now because I know your username. I literally don’t need to know anything else about you, except for your activity on the site. That said I’m somewhat impressed. Impressed by how anyone would come up with something this stupid.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would anyone want this functionality?

      I’m guessing this is so if Elon gets a negative reply to one of his tweets he can call that person up and threaten them or something?

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can already make video calls from Signal, which isn’t run by neofarcists.

    (That was a typo, but it’s fitting.)

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Stragglers of a dying platform get new bait and switch service. Expect fees once enought people use it.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The system means that all accounts are liable to receive calls from accounts you follow, or those run by people whose number you have in your address book. To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.

    You’re not going to get phone calls from just any rando.

    • captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right. Cause I deleted that app months ago.

      “They must have sent one DM” - so any rando that has sent an unwelcome DM can follow it with a call?

      • malijaffri@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.

        Emphasis mine.

        To me, it seems like it means that for me to be able to call you, you need to send me at least one DM AND be following me. So, in essence, any rando that you folllow and have previously sent a DM to can call you.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s my interpretation. If you follow someone, and have sent them a message previously, it’s a reasonable assumption you want to talk to them.

  • sanqueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why do people still use X these days? Stop using and EM will eventually be forced to close the company down

  • serial_crusher@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Headline: “let’s anyone you follow potentially call you up”

    Article: “To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.”

    This makes total sense. Your DM conversation has too much back and forth so you say “let’s take it to an audio or video call”, and then hash it out in person.

    There’s a reason Slack has this exact same feature…

    • jcg@halubilo.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the problem here is there’s no prior consent. If you’ve DM’d someone in the past, they can now call you. Twitter never had video call before, and the people who use it never expected to be giving consent for a video call maybe even several years later.

  • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    He is really after making it an “everything app” which nobody uses. Anyone here really has twitter or Facebook installed on their phone ?

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The average lemmy user maybe not, but year hundreds of millions of people still use twitter, and billions use Facebook.

      • spiderman@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Started using mastodon recently, but I still surf twitter to see what my friends are tweeting about.

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone still on twitter who is actually affected by this deserves every bit of it. What else did they think Musky was going to do.