LesDeuxBonsYeux@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoRulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square364fedilinkarrow-up1951arrow-down10
arrow-up1951arrow-down1imageRulesh.itjust.worksLesDeuxBonsYeux@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square364fedilink
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYou’ve literally argued that I’m seeing about the idiom for well over a dozen comments. Your memory is apparently quite short.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoNeed more boo boo? https://feddit.de/comment/4681048
minus-squarePrunebutt@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agohttps://toneindicators.carrd.co/#masterlist
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agohttps://douchebag.com/ I can provide links that don’t change the substance of the argument as well.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI do, I also know it doesn’t actually change what you’ve said. You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was, adding /s doesn’t change that.
minus-squarePrunebutt@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years ago You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was That’s not what the comment you linked sad. I didn’t say anything about the idiom itself.
You’ve literally argued that I’m seeing about the idiom for well over a dozen comments. Your memory is apparently quite short.
Where? Show me a comment/quote.
Need more boo boo?
https://feddit.de/comment/4681048
https://toneindicators.carrd.co/#masterlist
https://douchebag.com/
I can provide links that don’t change the substance of the argument as well.
Do you know what “sarcasm” is?
I do, I also know it doesn’t actually change what you’ve said.
You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was, adding /s doesn’t change that.
That’s not what the comment you linked sad. I didn’t say anything about the idiom itself.