To be honest I’m not even sure what the point of student associations is anyway. Shouldn’t students all have access to services without joining associations? If students can form associations, does it matter that much what the association is about? I understand from an organizational standpoint that a Jewish organization wouldn’t want to incorporate or support something that’s against Judaism, but you can’t really stop students from associating, can you?
…a Jewish organization wouldn’t want to incorporate or support something that’s against Judaism…
I’ve been involved in academic biblical studies for over 30 years. There is NO biblical NOR Talmudic prohibition against LGBTQ.
These misunderstandings (and sometimes this is just straight up intentional bigotry) are almost always formed in conservative and/or fundamentalist religious groups.
Your position on this is a bit extreme it seems, but I agree there is a modicum of leeway in how religious Jews and Christians can deal with the issue in spite of the fact that homosexuality is regarded as a sin in their traditions.
Your position on this is a bit extreme…
It, really, isn’t. This is the scholarly consensus shared worldwide. And it’s not a personal position. It is a scholarly on based one textual analysis.
…homosexuality is regarded as a sin in their traditions.
Again, ONLY conservative and/or fundamentalist groups which are, almost always, the minority.
I hate to say that but what you are claiming simply is not true. You are the one espousing a minority opinion but claiming it’s the majority opinion in order to give it greater credence, it seems. It is obvious and does not need to be argued, that Christianity and Judaism have traditionally condemned homosexuality. What is the point of misrepresenting this?
Let’s think about this in a very simple manner. These texts were written between 3,000 and 5,000 years ago by humans. Do you believe that ancient human beings understood things (sexual, moral, ethical, etc) the way we do today? It’s like asking what the biblical texts thought about Phillips head screwdrivers.
The part of biblical scholarship, that is very focused on how people would have thought about a particular subject, is called reception history. I’ve studied this for over twenty years and the biblical texts do not prohibit NOR do they address any modern concepts such as LGBTQ+.
You are, now, accusing me of misrepresenting and misinforming people which is NOT nice. Our guiding principal, at Beehaw, is ‘Be(e) nice’. Thus, I’d suggest that you back down from your stance.
deleted by creator
What would you suggest? Please, show how I am not being nice.
You are, now, accusing me of misrepresenting and misinforming people which is NOT nice. Our guiding principal, at Beehaw, is ‘Be(e) nice’. Thus, I’d suggest that you back down from your stance.
To my understanding as an Ex-Christian, Christianity and Judaism have indeed traditionally condemned homosexuality (going back a significant time interval, also variously classified under sodomy which also covers way more), and I believe that the earliest form of Christianity also condemned homosexuality, which is part of the reasons I de-converted.
What I’m referring to, specifically, is the past decade. In the past ten years, give or take, Christianity & Judaism condemning (from the pulpit) LGBTQ+ persons is a minority position mainly held by fundamentalist and/or conservative groups.
I believe that the earliest form of Christianity also condemned homosexuality…
There, simply, is not any textual evidence to support this. I have studied the early Jesus movement leading up to the second century of Christianity and there is no condemnation toward personal sexual practices.
I am being nice but I just don’t think it’s reasonable to make this claim that you are making, that these faiths did not condemn homosexuality. The first paragraph in your last response seems to support exactly what I’m saying, because you’re saying well those religions are thousands of years old so they didn’t know any better. So, we are in agreement, right?
However, there is a deeper point in your first paragraph worth looking at. Your claim that ancient humans didn’t know about things which we have today like Phillips head screwdrivers (which did not exist, and they didn’t know what that was), doesn’t apply to things like sexuality and morals (which did exist, and they were familiar with them). Homosexuality isn’t a new thing; it’s been the same for a lot more than three or five thousands years. Humans have been having sex for a heck of a lot longer than that.
What it seems to me that you are doing, is creating modern reinterpretations of ancient religious traditions in order to have them suit you better, rather than looking at them as long-standing traditions, which is how most people understand them. Also, I can’t understand why this revision matters so much to you.
You never did say why it matters to claim that the majority of Christians don’t believe homosexuality is a sin. We all know that this isn’t true, but is it that important to be with the majority? You can just say the majority is wrong, and your minority or heterodox view is right.
I understand wanting to reform Christianity and Judaism rather than abandoning them, but so far my view on these recent attempts to refashion them into LGBT religions as a pipe dream. Why not just abandon them and find another religion (or none at all)?
There is NO biblical NOR Talmudic prohibition against LGBTQ.
Reliable source on this?
misunderstandings (and sometimes this is just straight up intentional bigotry) are almost always formed in conservative and/or fundamentalist religious groups.
For this as well?
Mostly interested in understading these points if they are true.
Sex and the Single Savior is one example. You could always just search https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/ and https://www.reddit.com/r/AskBibleScholars/. All of this has been covered in both subreddits extensively.
If students can form associations, does it matter that much what the association is about?
We have laws to protect against hate and harming others. If you freely associate a group to spread hate, this should not be allowed. I disagree with the supreme court here in that they should not allow universities to suppress non-hateful groups. But then again, they want to openly discriminate against pretty much all minorities given their stances on existing supreme court precedence so it’s not surprising the court found the way it did.
To be honest I’m not even sure what the point of student associations is anyway.
I’m honestly not really sure myself. But from just having done some research online it looks like associations are meant to represent the students and advocate for their needs?
By that measure an LGBT association sounds reasonable
Time to stock up on weapons comrades
