• pelya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. And networking would inevitably involve vodka. All major decisions would eventually involve vodka in USSR.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Vodka had been linked to the Russian economy under multiple Czars. I’m not sure that Stalin could have separated the two even if he had wanted to. Admittedly it doesn’t appear that he wanted to.

          I’m pretty sure that the USSR was screwed the moment that Lenin returned from exile in Germany, or when Wilson was elected. Take your pick.

          The Menchaviks would have been a better government.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just find it ironic that Stalin was everything that the party worried about Trotsky becoming.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The mechaviks literally wanted to continue ww1 and have a psuedo democracy where the bourgeoisie were literally guaranteed a majority of seats, wtf are you talking about?

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wasn’t aware of that. I was under the impression they were less extreme than the Bolsheviks, and didn’t want to execute everyone that wasn’t a hard core Bolshevik

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                They were more extreme than the bolseviks but less extreme than the monarchists, they were just on the side of capitalists so were painted with a nicer brush by capitalist historians