DJ Calvert told BBC News NI: “I’ve been let down - and I’m not the only one.”

It was proof that Northern Ireland’s health and social care system had “crashed”, said the 49-year-old.

  • DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Billionaires exist and this poor man can’t get a goddamn health care worker.

    At all levels of government we’re (worldwide) making due with less while these fucking parasites grow.

    Shit is going to get ugly in the next few decades…

    • Szymon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Eat the rich, problem solves itself.

      I’ll argue that you only need to eat five rich. The first two will be shocking, the next two will be surprising that they were eaten despite all the security measures, the fifth being eaten is the reminder that the rich will be eaten.

      You’ve taken care of like, 50% of the billionaires parasite issue with those 5, the remaining few will suddenly decide that social welfare programs are a good idea and donate so much that they are no longer billionaires.

      • Zorque@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eat the rich and more rich pop up. It takes more than just “let’s get rid of who we think the sole problem is and everything will turn out fine”. The rich didn’t just appear from a vacuum, they’ve accumulated power and wealth for centuries, if not millennia. “Eating the rich” would require vastly more fundamental changes than just grabbing goods from the nearest billionaire and tossing at “the poors”.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol Eat the rich is a euphemism for killing them…not just taking their wealth.

          • Skyline969@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. Dine upon the flesh of the rich. Consume their nutrients so that you may absorb their power.

      • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is that value is derived from property rather than from work. You earn substantially more by owning a machine than by operating that machine, which rewards people who have money more than people who have skills.

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes but their is not real answer to that. Even comunism where people own the means of production. Turns into a state where the leaders of that state make more money owning the machines then the workers on those machines.

          Any system will always result in a cost to start the industry be it land in the past. Machines in the present or AI in the future. Those who have the resources to provide work for others will always have some form of power. And power will always lead to corruption.

          All differing political stratagies do is change the process for gaining that power.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Humanity would probably have to eliminate psycho/sociopathic behavior. Something like 1% of humanity (much higher rate in billionaire and CEO populations, like 25%+).

            Like you said, designing a system that prevents them from taking control without pretty draconian measures that are likely to catch many false positives (and still be evaded by skilled psycho/sociopaths) seems pretty difficult.

            Maybe AI will be able to filter them out of the population, but that’s full of moral and ethical pitfalls too.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Turns into a state where the leaders of that state make more money owning the machines then the workers on those machines.

            Except not really. Corruption is a problem but corruption happens in bourgeois democracy too, the overwhelmingly main source of wealth extraction that we can eliminate is surplus labor value extraction brought about by property relations. State socialism cuts away a massive problem while still retaining smaller ones.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d like to propose for maximum psychological impact they should be literally eaten using whatever gold plated dishware and diamond knives they’ve got laying around.

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do we keep saying ‘eat the rich’?

        Just take their wealth and give it to those who need it. It is literally that simple.

        Make them part of the working class. It’s a fate worse than death in their eyes.

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem is it’s just a phrase. You can keep repeating it ad nauseam, but unless it comes with actual strategies to complete a goal… it’s as meaningless a phrase as all the rhetoric that right-wingers throw around. And they’re much better at it.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not like entire books have been written by people who ran successful revolutions overthrowing the capitalists or anything.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not everywhere…

      The real (inflation-adjusted) incomes of the poorest half of the Chinese population increased by more than four hundred percent from 1978 to 2015, while real incomes of the poorest half of the US population actually declined during the same time period. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23119/w23119.pdf

      From 1978 to 2000, the number of people in China living on under $1/day fell by 300 million, reversing a global trend of rising poverty that had lasted half a century (i.e. if China were excluded, the world’s total poverty population would have risen) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/China’s-Economic-Growth-and-Poverty-Reduction-Angang-Linlin/c883fc7496aa1b920b05dc2546b880f54b9c77a4

      From 2010 to 2019 (the most recent period for which uninterrupted data is available), the income of the poorest 20% in China increased even as a share of total income. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.DST.FRST.20?end=2019&locations=CN&start=2008

      By the end of 2020, extreme poverty, defined as living on under a threshold of around $2 per day, had been eliminated in China. According to the World Bank, the Chinese government had spent $700 billion on poverty alleviation since 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/31/world/asia/china-poverty-xi-jinping.html

      https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience

      • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why the Chinese people are very supportive of their government. You would be too in this situation.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously. How much do you get paid for shilling China so hard? And where do I sign up?

        • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “why are we talking about the communist party of china under an article about how the bourgeoisie continues to accumulate wealth to the detriment of the proletariat?”

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This thread is about a dude in Ireland. It has nothing to do with China.

            Say what you want about the west, but China isn’t what the world should be either.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s pretty hilarious how I posted sourced information that made you really mad, but since you had no actual counter point to make you just proceeded to expose yourself as a clown by regurgitating personal attacks you’ve memorized. A great way to tell us all that you’re really mad, but too dumb to say anything intelligible on the subject. 😂

              • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Oh you got me. I’m so mad and dumb.

                Dude, you endlessly post about how awesome China is. I don’t have to love everything about the west to realize that that’s fucking weird.

                Every time anyone calls you out on anything you use your “seethe and cope” catchphrase.

                It’s either your job or you’re a nut. It’s not worth debating you.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The fact that you took the time to write this drivel is pretty hilarious. It’s nice to know that my posts really get under the skin of people like you.

  • michaelrose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    The sad thing is in the US its extremely likely the fellow would have already been dead after years living on the streets with a cardboard sign.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A man born without hands or legs has been told he will soon no longer get a daily visit from a care worker to help him shower and get dressed.

    It added that it understood “the worry it is causing”, and would “seek an alternative provider” that would “support him to continue living independently in his own home”.

    His care is provided by Connected Health but that is due to end on 1 December, with the company telling BBC News NI that it was “increasingly stretched in ever more demanding circumstances”.

    Mr Calvert’s friend Vicky has been making additional visits to help four days a week but now that looks to be the only assistance he will get.

    Mr Calvert’s mother, Heather, said she “just couldn’t believe it” when she heard that her son was losing his care package.

    She told Evening Extra that over the past seven months the situation surrounding DJ’s care has been “a rollercoaster”.


    The original article contains 776 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      My dad in his 79 years of wisdom told me a few years back about brexit ( we have been in Canada since the 70s)

      “It’s just a roundabout way to say we don’t like brown people”

      I still stick by that. Succinct.