I’ve been aware of pi-hole for a while now, but never bothered with it because I do most web browsing on a laptop where browser extensions like uBlock origin are good enough. However, with multiple streaming services starting to insert adds into my paid subscriptions, I’m looking to upgrade to a network blocker that will also cover the apps on my smart TV.

I run most of my self hosted services on a proxmox server, so I’d like something that’ll run as an LXC container or a VM. I’m also vaguely aware that various competing applications have come out since pi-hole first gained popularity. Is pi-hole still the best thing going, or are there better options?

    • guajojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Pihole user for more than 5 years,.can confirm that it is indeed better, made the switch few months ago

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        What makes adguard home better than pihole? Genuinely curious, I’m running pihole now and have been for a couple of years without issues.

      • Maximilious@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        What makes it better other than the UI? I’m weary of using it because it is developed by Russian developers.

        • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Encryption, UI, probably a little bit more serious development

          But encryption is a big thing, DoT, DoH, Quic. And soon they will have ECH

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              That’s a bunch of extra manual work though - both the initial setup, plus keeping the extra software packages up-to-date. With AdGuard Home, it’s already configured to use DoH by default.

            • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Hold on, this is not the same encryption

              The encryption i was talking about is the encryption of your dns server

              The article you sent is talking about upstream dns server encryption

              • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                The encryption i was talking about is the encryption of your dns server

                You mean encryption between the client and your DNS server, on your local network?

                • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You can do it on your local network, but this won’t make much sense

                  I mean encryption between your phone or laptop outside of your house, and your dns server at your house

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s cool for certain applications but on my home network should I really be super concerned about DNS encryption?

            • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Not within the network, but translating regular dns to DoH before heading out to WAN keeps your browsing a little bit more private from your isp. Marginal, but it is a difference.

              • dan@upvote.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s not just a little bit more private… It’s a lot more private. Some ISPs have been known to build advertising profiles using DNS data. It’s trivial for them to see all DNS lookups and even modify the responses, since it’s both unencrypted and unauthenticated by default.

            • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Probably not, but anyway it’s pretty cool to have an option to do this kind of stuff

              You can set up this dns on your phone, laptop, without a need of vpn (although vpns are cool, especially tailscale)

              But, are you always connected to the vpn? Or even to connect to the vpn itself you probably need dns, why would not use your own

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        As an AdGuard home user for more than a few years, I switched back to Pihole because it wasn’t really any better. It was also easier to pair pihole with Unbound.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It works well! I have one AdGuardHome instance running on my home server and one running on a Raspberry Pi, both using Docker. Having two prevents the internet from breaking in case I have to shut down one of them for some reason.