there’s no meme, no spiel, that’s it.

  • Krafty Kactus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    858 months ago

    Assuming you mean the Palestinian people and not Hamas, fuck yeah we do!

  • MossOPM
    link
    fedilink
    718 months ago

    sorry for not making this post sooner, I’ve kind of been completely absent for the past 3+ months

  • Another Catgirl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    288 months ago

    if an average 196 community member stands among Palestinians, in Palestine, obeying Palestinian laws, how long would they last?

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      628 months ago

      israel would probably bomb their home so not too long

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      34
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Palestinians are quite liberal and progressive compared to other Arabs, and being gay is legal in the West Bank – that doesn’t mean that there’s no issues, this article about a planned LGBT youth camp gives a good impression. There’s allies, but keep your head down and out of sight of religious nutjobs. It’s pretty much the same thing atheists do over there: Plenty of them around with all that secular history but the religious nutjobs are simply too rabid to allow public discourse about the topic. It’s way easier to go the “secular Muslim” route: Fast, but not for Allah.

      In Gaza the legal situation is undetermined (scholars disagree on whether British mandate law prohibiting gay sex still applies) but anyway Hamas is in power, they instituted a religious police, tried to enforce headscarfs, go after male hairdressers cutting women’s hairs without any legal basis etc. don’t look at the statute book Hamas doesn’t care and they’re crazy. Also you don’t want to go to Gaza right now. Also, you probably can’t even if you’re an UN aid worker.

    • If an average person is constantly subjected to food insecurity, lacking access to clean water and sanitation, lacking medical treatment, random injury and death through constant bombings, random injury and death of relatives and friends through constant bombings and limited access to education and working opportunities, how likely are they able to concern themselves with social progress?

      If we look at western countries, social progress came in times of relative safety and wealth for the broad population, while reactionary politics came in times, where these were lowered or cut. It is no coincidence that reactionary politicians combine economic hardship for the masses with scapegoating and fighting against minorities.

      The way to progressive politics in Gaza is paved with working infrastructure, proper access to basic needs and a perspective for social and personal development.

    • @zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      188 months ago

      With all that dysentery, lack of food, shelter, constant threat of getting blown up? Ehh maybe 2 days cuz I’m twice as old as the average person there.

      • @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        Polar bears will treat you the same regardless of what colour, gender, or sexuality you are, to be fair.

    • Mario_Dies.wav
      link
      fedilink
      128 months ago

      IMO that’s not very pertinent since we have the privilege of not being in that situation. Here’s a quote from something I read that might help reconcile this:

      If we understand this sense of negative and positive freedom, what appears as a contradictory stance within anarchism makes perfect sense. An anarchist might firmly believe that the Palestinian people deserve to be liberated from occupation, even if that means that they set up their own state. That same anarchist might also firmly believe that a Palestinian state, like all states, should be opposed in favor of nonstatist institutions. A complete sense of freedom would always include both the negative and positive senses—in this case, liberation from occupation and simultaneously the freedom to self-determine. Otherwise, as both actually existing Communist and liberal regimes have demonstrated, “freedom from” on its own will serve merely to enslave human potentiality, and at its most extreme, humans themselves; self-governance is denied in favor of a few governing over others. And “freedom to,” on its own, as capitalism has shown, will serve merely to promote egotistic individualism and pit each against each; self-determination trumps notions of collective good. Constantly working to bring both liberation and freedom to the table, within moments of resistance and reconstruction, is part of that same juggling act of approximating an increasingly differentiated yet more harmonious world.

      -Cindy Milstein, Anarchism and Its Aspirations (2010)

      This is something I just happened to read, but we’ve been discussing Palestine a lot in my discord server. If anyone would like links to some more readings about Palestine and why things are the way they are, I have a lot of links to free ebooks I’d be happy to share (freely accessible, non-pirated). I’m not sure it would be appropriate to post them here, and I lack the mental bandwidth to deal with the possibility of sea lions and other bad-faith responders, but I’d be happy to share the links in a DM.

    • @UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Whatever’s left after Israel is done with its sanctioned genocide. Just to be clear by Israel I refer to Natanyau and his goons. Wether he represents the people of Israel is very debatable but not as much as Hamas which isn’t democratic like at all and doesn’t represent the Palestinians at all.

    • MossOPM
      link
      fedilink
      328 months ago

      I’m sorry but Hamas is almost completely annihilated at this point. in addition, they do not represent the Palestinian people. I do not condone terrorist attacks, but once a nation has killed 20-fold greater numbers of people, and is currently razing the entire nation (who at this point has little to no military) innocent lives and all into dust it becomes a lot easier to pick a side.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          138 months ago

          So the other side will keep exploding the first side violently until the hostages are back.

          It’s not about the hostages. Otherwise they would stop bombing Gaza and actually use diplomacy to get them back instead of blowing them up.

          • @stratosfear@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            88 months ago

            Not to mention releasing hostages will not in any way change the status quo. When someone has held their boot on your neck for decades what incentive do you have to give them anything? Absolutely fuck terrorists but Israel’s treatment and process going back a long time has created this very situation. They have the power so they must be the ones to acquiesce. But typical rightwing fuckoffs running that place of course don’t want to acknowledge this simple aspect of power balance.

    • MossOPM
      link
      fedilink
      558 months ago

      what the fuck does that even mean

        • MossOPM
          link
          fedilink
          88 months ago

          that sounds like no joke the worst thing ever

      • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sorry I picked you at random to reply to. Revisiting this comment with a sober mind, I have no idea what I was talking about. Maybe create a bot that identifies the top 400 riches people in the world and spends its existance phishing and scamming them at a rate no human can do? The idea sat better when I couldn’t think it through.

  • @jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Any tips on keeping your cool when people wave around Israeli flags during a pro-Palestine protest? I started shaking with adrenaline as if it was right before a fight. D:

  • Peter Arbeitslos
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    27 months ago

    What do you exactly mean by standing with Palistine? I’ve heard this sentence in so many contexts and everyone differs in the understanding of Palestine and standing with it.

        • MossOPM
          link
          fedilink
          47 months ago

          oh my god ok jesus fucking christ
          It literally just means we don’t support the way Israel has historically bullied Palestine and its people, and that we especially stand against the current razing of gaza. I don’t really think that our announcement of “standing with” Palestine accomplishes much of substance; it’s more of a symbolic gesture. Do you have any further questions?