• tooclose104@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ya but your argument is also expecting public space to be given to you to the detriment of others. It’s a double edged sword.

    “Park on a different street” literally just shifts the problem.

    If a public parking lot was available then ya, totally feasible, but it’ll have to be big which then takes up the land from something else, again shifting the problem.

    You’re getting upitty with someone who is concerned that knee-jerk public policy is going to have large, likely unplanned, detrimental effects on the citizens outside of just themselves.

    • EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Park on a different street” literally just shifts the problem.

      Actually I’m more going for “don’t have a car if you don’t have anywhere to put it”. I know it’s an unpopular opinion, but having a car is not a right and the sheer volume of them is to the detriment of the entire population.

    • pearable@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Taking space used for cars and giving it to cyclist does actually make everyone’s life better, even drivers. You get less pollution, traffic, medical cost to the NHS, pedestrian deaths, and infrastructure costs.