Judge cuts law firm’s legal bill in half after it used ChatGPT to calculate “excessive” amount | ChatGPT thinks lawyers don’t get paid enough, apparently::undefined

  • @the_kung_fu_emu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Reminds me of using graphing calculators back in highschool. “Can we use it on the test?” “Sure! But remember, it will only help you if you know how to check your work and bother to do so.” Automating anything blindly carries the risk of unending buckets of water or a universe of paperclips. Trouble is, it seems like a fair number of folks are confusing automation with delegation.

    • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      Oh, we weren’t allowed to use them, or at least our own because you could go into the programming module and write yourself notes and make a cheat sheet.

    • Doofus Magoo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      Automating anything blindly carries the risk of unending buckets of water or a universe of paperclips.

      Nutty – I was just chewing on that similarity myself.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    219 months ago

    This is why I think the single payer model should be expanded to the judiciary, let the govt haggle over lawyer’s fees and let the people have access to justice without needing to pay tens of thousands just for their own lawyer.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      Honest question: Would someone be able to still hire/use their own attorney in such a system?

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        I’d imagine it’d be like having your own personal doctor under single payer health care, depending on the system the most you’d have to front at point of service is a small “co-pay”, ultimately though you would still be able to “hire” whichever lawyer you think will best represent your judiciary interests.

        • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 months ago

          So we’d end up with a pay-to-win system that’s little different from the current system.

          I don’t know what the answer is - it’s certainly not a simple problem.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            I mean it’s only “Pay to win” in the sense that you need to pay anything at all, and there’s still the hospital route where your lawyer is provided for you at time of litigation. The difference is immediacy and regular access, not in being able to access it at all.

  • @Ludrol
    link
    English
    89 months ago

    A classic misaligment problem. Human wanted a fair wage, AI gave a number that would please the human.

  • @XTL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49 months ago

    Poly twist: chat gpt used the “whatever you think it’s gonna cost and then double it” rule. But it had calculated the cost perfectly.