• chetradley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    9 months ago

    An evolutionary biologist might argue that all of these are done in the service of being able to have sex:

    • Gotta make money so I can live comfortably and keep having sex.
    • Gotta defend my country because all of the women who want to have sex with me live there.
    • Man, chicks dig firefighters. I’m gonna have so much sex.
    • TxzK@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you’re talking evolution, that argument also applies to women as well. We, as a species, are still alive only because our instinct to pass down our genes. Same with every other form of life.

      • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Man, the people who invented contraception must have been such a fuckup from evolution’s point of view. Evolution must be tearing its hear out rn

        • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          There’s a lot of evolutionary processes that don’t have to do with having more offspring, but increasing the viability of less offspring. Having kids, no matter the species, is a very costly affair. You could argue that mate selection generally reduces the number of offspring, but increases the viability.

          I’ve read a hypothesis (very much unproven) that having some gay members of a species increases the viability by having more people to care for the offspring without being in mate competition. It’s called the gay uncle hypothesis

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      I feel like every time out of academia I hear about evolutionary biology it’s always something turbo sexist.

    • WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      It should be noted that evolution doesn’t care about individuals, so not only behavior which increases an individuals chances of having children are incentivized. Evolution happens in a population, which is why it is advantageous for a group to have selfless traits.

  • dianea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was riding my motorcycle today. Not too many other ways to put two hundred horsepower between my legs

  • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Men only think about sex *in relation to women/relationships

    Not that I follow that rhetoric but that the context when that phrase is uttered, often as a cautionary tale to young women.