Just to get it out of the way: I’m a bit older than of most you. I’m an old school FOSS contributor: Slackware, couple kernel merges, and some weak device driver contributions.

I’m just not WOW’d by this Plasma release that is spoken as a Herculean effort. I’m seeing the news everywhere, and it seems everyone is clamoring to get it, but it mostly seems like 90% cosmetic changes, no? I must be missing something.

Here are the things I’ve gathered are non-cosmetic:

  • Update to QT6
  • Better Wayland interactions (HDR notable)
  • Compositor improvements for gaming

Everything else seems like eye candy. I feel like Gnome and forks, or Xfce have been faster to the fight on these things, and this KDE release took many years. So what do I have wrong here?

  • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
    49·
    9 months ago

    You mean “swinging”? I’ll also bite. Things that would make me switch:

    • incorporating Valve’s work
    • Simplifying KDE apps and menus
    • Fix the fullscreen composite issues
    • Fix dbus access for apps launched via KDE
    • Hone the media controls like GNOME
    • Fix Kwallet so it doesn’t crash on every unexpected error
    • Stop the constant refresh rate negotiation for VRR and make it not blank screens
    • Stop the unnecessary userland restrictions for devices like USB ports
    • Stop secondary mounts to remote locations just because I connected that one time
    • If the secret store isn’t working, just say so. Don’t loop and ask me if I want to relaunch

    All fairly low-hanging fruit.